Talk:Major League Baseball Player of the Week Award

This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Awards This article is within the scope of WikiProject Awards, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of awards and prizes on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AwardsWikipedia:WikiProject AwardsTemplate:WikiProject Awardsawards articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. Baseball Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Baseball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of baseball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BaseballWikipedia:WikiProject BaseballTemplate:WikiProject BaseballBaseball articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

To make this page more accessible, I suggest we link the first instance of each acroynm to its corresponding Wiki article, e.g.

Done - RoadView (talk) 17:01, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Who makes the decisions for each league? What's the process? Who controls it? That's what I'd like to know.98.243.173.66 (talk) 21:21, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The lead is inaccurate; Albert Pujols won the award back in 2001. Sanfranciscogiants17 (talk) 15:07, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

So all of the winners back to 1974 are available on Baseball-Reference and back to 1990 on MLB.com. Do we really want to list every single winner? This award has been given out about 1,200 times per league. Why does the current article only go back to 2008? Should this format instead be swapped for only listing multiple winners? Maybe list consecutive winners or the longest consecutive streaks or the youngest winners or oldest winners or longest period of time between wins or something? Dennis C. Abrams (talk) 15:53, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Wasn't that around the time the page was created? I didn't create the page, I just update it weekly. posty (talk) 16:26, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• • But should that mean that it shouldn't go back earlier than that? If not, is it really worth the effort to add the more than 2,000 players omitted? Dennis C. Abrams (talk) 16:38, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• • • Probably, but I just add the weekly results to it. The page can be even requested to be deleted, whatever is better. I just like updating the information weekly. posty (talk) 18:44, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]