Talk:Marilyn Diptych

This  level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Visual arts This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles London Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Women This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

"currently ... part of the exhibition: Witty, Sexy, Gimmicky: Pop 1957-67." I would suggest that the start date (month? season?) of the exhibition be added, or else replace "currently" with an "as of XXX" date. --Eliyahu S ^Talk 09:43, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

In the Infobox of this article, the "Type:" is listed as "Gouach". I am unfamiliar with this term and can find no on point references to this term in Wikipedia or in a greater Internet search. The closest art term that I could find is "Gouache", but that style of watermedia technique does not appear to have been used by Warhol in this piece. I believe a more correct entry for "Type:" should be "Silkscreen Diptych", but I readily defer to a more authoritative revision. Krellkraver (talk) 18:35, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]