Talk:Maryland Route 10

	Maryland Route 10 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones Date Process Result February 26, 2013 Good article nominee Listed

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

U.S. Roads: State highways / Maryland Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Topics  U.S. state highways   Locations  Maryland   This article has a map. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it. This article has a junction list compliant with the Manual of Style on road junction lists. This article has a KML file. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it. Article recognition:   This article was the Maryland Roads portal in February 2016.

This review is

transcluded from Talk:Maryland Route 10/GA1

. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: TCN7JM (talk · contribs) 17:07, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I'll take this one. Not right now, though. –TCN7JM 17:07, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox

• Pasadena and Glen Burnie only need to be linked once each.
  • Done.  VC  02:13, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Route description

• allowing access between MD 177 and the direction of Baltimore. I can't really understand what this is saying, honestly.
  • I rewrote that part to remove the confusion by explicitly stating what the ramps do.  VC  02:13, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

History

• The middle of the second paragraph is pretty choppy. Maybe use conjunctions to combine a couple sentences?
  • Can you explain which sentences you think need work?  VC  02:13, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    • The freeway from the Beltway to Furnace Branch was under construction by 1972; the highway opened from the Beltway to MD 710 in December 1972. MD 710 had been relocated in conjunction with the construction of MD 10 and the Beltway in 1972; the portion of the Beltway from MD 2 to MD 10 opened at the same time. The Arundel Expressway was marked as MD 10 by 1974. Construction on the extension south to MD 648 was underway by 1975. Kinda reads like a list, in my opinion, maybe with the exception of the first phrase of the second sentence. –TCN7JM 02:18, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
      • I rewrote most of those sentences. Let me know how it looks.  VC  00:19, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
        • Looks better! –TCN7JM 00:50, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Major intersections

• Normally, I'd criticize on your use of both commas and semicolons in the junction list, but I can see how it works here.

That's it. I'm putting this on hold so you can fix stuff. –TCN7JM 17:46, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your review, TCN7JM.  VC  02:13, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not a problem! Pass! –TCN7JM 00:50, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Maryland Route 10. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121025170746/http://www.baltometro.org/reports/Major%20Transp%20Milestones%20Since%201940.pdf to http://www.baltometro.org/reports/Major%20Transp%20Milestones%20Since%201940.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:32, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]