Talk:Matt "Guitar" Murphy

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Possible copyright problem

This article has been revised as part of

guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Diannaa (talk) 01:19, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

Date of birth

The interview at tomguerra.com, currently given as an External link, gives his date of birth as December 28, 1929 not December 29, 1929. Is that a mistake in the current lead and infobox? Martinevans123 (talk) 12:33, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 20 August 2018

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved. Consensus is there with the numbers in support, and also a sound rationale that the actual formulation Matt "Guitar" Murphy appears frequently in sources and on his own album.  — Amakuru (talk) 22:28, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Matt Murphy (blues guitarist) → Matt "Guitar" Murphy
– I've given this a lot of thought, and think it makes sense:

Thanks, RubenSchade (talk) 22:39, 20 August 2018 (UTC)--Relisting. Dekimasuよ! 20:37, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Survey
I agree with what you say, although I'm very surprised you might think Johnny "Guitar" Watson is just a case of "inertia". Martinevans123 (talk) 17:31, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I see no evidence of any page moves or RM discussions for Johnny "Guitar" Watson. That's all I'm saying. As best I can tell, its name is the result of one person's initial edit in April 2005. —BarrelProof (talk) 18:17, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Well ok. It's just that I believe every one of Johnny "Guitar" Watson's records, with almost no exceptions, was credited to that name. Just take a look at all his album covers. Not sure what the situation is with Murphy. I guess we do have articles named like Bobby Bland and Eddie Vinson, but we also have plenty like Cannonball Adderley and Pops Staples. Martinevans123 (talk) 18:25, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Moved the Lucky Charm album into the Solo Discography section

The

Lucky Charm (Matt "Guitar" Murphy album) article I created was deemed not notable enough, and was redirected back here. I discussed with the New Page Patroller, and they were kind enough to explain why (see here
).

I still assert its notable enough for its own article (and certainly more than most stub-class albums I've come across, to be honest) but until we can find more references specifically discussing the album and not just Matt, I've included in the Solo discography section instead.

If anyone's able to find more references, or have ideas, feel free to comment here or on my talk page and I'll review this decision.

Cheers --RubenSchade (talk) 00:10, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Italics in article title

I don't think there should be italics in the title of the article, as it's about a person, but so far i can't find whatever put the italics there in order to remove them. ~ merlin 1987 ~ (talk) 13:53, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm no expert, but my guess is that it's because the article includes {{Infobox album}}, so it is assumed that the article is about the album. It would be better if the albums (certainly the album with the infobox, at least) be hived off into separate articles. Though, having just read the comment above, if the album doesn't meet the notability criteria then, simply, the album infobox should be removed. Ghmyrtle (talk) 15:06, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
... which I've now done, and the article title has reverted to standard non-italic font. Ghmyrtle (talk) 15:10, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for raising this. You're right, it was because an infobox was included. I was directed to move the contents of that album's article into this page, because the album didn't satisfy notability to have its own article (despite another article with the same references passing). This is one of the reasons that decision was regrettable. One day I'll find more sources and push this back onto a separate article again. Cheers --RubenSchade (talk) 07:23, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]