Talk:Maxentius

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Maxentius article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Biography: Military / Royalty and Nobility

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the military biography work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility (assessed as Low-importance).

Classical Greece and Rome Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Biography / Roman & Byzantine / Classical

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military biography task force
	Roman and Byzantine military history task force
	Classical warfare task force (c. 700 BC – c. 500 AD)

Roman and Byzantine emperors Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of the Roman and Byzantine Emperors WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the Roman and Byzantine emperors. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Roman and Byzantine emperorsWikipedia:WikiProject Roman and Byzantine emperorsTemplate:WikiProject Roman and Byzantine emperorsRoman and Byzantine emperors articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the importance scale.

Untitled

BTW, Guys, for information on Maxentius murdering babies, check out Norwich's 'Byzantium: The Early Centuries'. Atheists cannot compete with that.

I will add it in 2 days unless any can offer sources to contend with this.

Sorry, please do not. The source for that accusation is Eusebius' Ecclesiastical History, in an account where he projects almost every known commonplace about tyrants and persecutors on Maxentius. Persecution of Christians and murder of many senators are also mentioned there, but obviously false charges. Considering that context and the extremely pro-Constantinian bias of Eusebius in general, I'd not cite that piece of Tyrannentopik as a reliable source. For Constantinian propaganda, Maxentius was the Enemy and a tyrant; tyrants were usually accused of superstition and magical practices (since they could not possibly be pious); and a standard commonplace about dark magical arts was the sacrifice of infants. That's the line of the argument - it's history rewritten by the victor.

If Norwich has it still in his book, he's simply borrowing from Eusebius. Norwich is not a primary source... Varana 13:44, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. Please sign your contributions. Thanks.

Rare insignia

They just found one in Rome

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20061203/ap_on_re_eu/italy_emperor_insignia —The preceding

unsigned comment was added by 202.33.24.132 (talk • contribs) 07:24, 4 December 2006 (UTC).[reply

]

Assessment comment The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Maxentius/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following
several discussions in past years
, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Comment(s) Press [show] to view →
Comments on the article for its progression :
Lead doesn't fully reflect the breadth of the article.

There in no reference section to which refer to when in doubt (External links don't count as references, see
WP:REF
).

As his father became emperor in 285, he was regarded as crown prince who would once follow his father on the throne. He seems not to have served in any important military or administrative position during Diocletian's and his father's reign, though. isn't sourced so it could stand as POV material.

maybe Diocletianus also thought that he was not qualified for the military duties of the imperial office, why?

This set the precedent for Maxentius' accession later in the same year. what was set?

Apparently the conspirators turned to Maximian as well, who had retired to a palace in Lucania, but he declined to resume power for the time being. is too pov for apparently should be founded on someone's assumption.

The prose is good, it could be better but it would stand as a GA had it more references and a better lead. Make sure you seek advice from the
featured article project. Lincher 14:04, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply
]

Last edited at 14:04, 24 August 2006 (UTC). Substituted at 23:31, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Crown Prince

Is this term meaningful in the context of the Roman Empire? Clivemacd (talk) 12:24, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Maxentius. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071012173415/http://www.chnpress.com/news/?section=2&id=7022 to http://www.chnpress.com/news/?section=2&id=7022

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template `{{source check`
`}}` (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.

If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:45, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Maxentius date of birth

Hi all,
there seems to be varying viewpoints on the year of Maxentius' birth. The only reliable source I seem to find is the book "tyranny and transformation" from the year 2000 by Eric Varner: which lists Maxentius as being born roughly from 276 to 283 (I would opt for the earlier end of the range as his son was born in 295, and its unlikely a 12-14 year old Maxentius would be even able to father a child). Can anyone find more specific dates/citations as to his birth year? Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by PrinceofFrancia (talk • contribs) 15:33, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]