Talk:Metamorphoses

Metamorphoses received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.

This  level-4 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Books Latin High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latin, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Latin on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LatinWikipedia:WikiProject LatinTemplate:WikiProject LatinLatin articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale. Poetry Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poetry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of poetry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoetryWikipedia:WikiProject PoetryTemplate:WikiProject PoetryPoetry articles Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. Mythology High‑importance High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Classical Greece and Rome Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

While this may be called an epic, it is a rather unusual one, in that there is no single thread running through it, as in Homer or Virgil. The subject, changes, is embodied in the form, which is always jumping about, breaking off and returning. Kenney has pointed out that this begins in the very first sentence, "in nova fert animus mutatas dicere formas/ corpora". You start by thinking he means "My mind is leading me on to something new", but then the appearance of the word "corpora" makes you realise that "nova" has to be taken with it, and this metamorphosises the sentence. At present I cannot give a reference to Kenney, but may be able to do so later. Seadowns (talk) 15:06, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

(inserted for readability ... said: Rursus (^mbork³) 12:48, 3 December 2009 (UTC))[reply]

What is meant by the Metamorphoses was the "first written"? First written what? There are many extant earlier works in Greek myth, not to mention those that have been lost. --Chinasaur 04:56, 26 Aug 2004 (UTC)

"Since it was first written" = "since it was written". - Nunh-huh 05:11, 26 Aug 2004 (UTC)

There's nothing in this article about what a genius Ovid was, or the stunning beauty of his work. Does that violate neutrality rules or something?Celsiana 23:54, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

well there are many works that are far better but none that cover this area of the gods and goddesses this well -[meeks]

I'm surprised that this article doesn't mention how Augustus is compared to Jupiter, making Ovid's mockery and critique of Jupiter almost subversive. The silencing of mortals, the theft of their voices and cooption of their meaning by gods through metamorphosis could be interpreted to reflect Augustus's habit of destroying prophetic scrolls and executing malcontents. The epilogue is also pretty much a direct mockery of Augustus's attepts to immortalize himself. The articles's description of the Metamorphoses as bereft of deeper meaning is in my opinion quite innacurate. Worlorn 10:12, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, this article is inadequate. (1) The section "Manuscript tradition" tells us platitudinally that the modern texts are okay but contains no details on the manuscripts. Then again, maybe the section should be deleted; does the general reader really care about the manuscript tradition? (2) Very little is said about English translations. Some mention should be made of the principal translations and their critical reception. (3) The section on adaptations is thin; I suspect there have been many, many other works influenced by Ovid. What about the Divine Comedy, for instance, or Handel's opera Semele? – Sorry to rant. I'd love to work on this myself, but I don't know much about the Latin classics. Grommel 21:51, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The initial paragraph of the section on the Transmission of the Metamorphoses is riddled with errors, so I am deleting most of it.

There is no evidence that the Church tried to suppress the Met. in Late Antiquity, or was even concerned about it being "pagan" (as if all the other works of Classical literature didn't mention the gods!).

The citation provided to Alan Cameron's "Greek Mythography in the Roman World" is misleading. On the relevant page, Cameron mentions in passing the theory of Urusla Hunt (1925), who suggested that the Late Antique commentary on the Metamorphoses, known as the Narrationes, was meant to sanitize Ovid's poem. Of course, Cameron then proceeds to dismiss this argument - so in fact the citation provided directly contradicts the content of the paragraph.

Also, the fact that the Narrationes - a late antique commentary on the Metamorphoses - was written largely contradicts one of the points of this paragraph. As written it suggests that the fact that there are no ancient scholia surviving on the Metamorphoses is an indication of ecclesiastical opposition to it. But the writing of commentaries (a related form of scholarly work to the composition of scholia) rather contradicts this idea.

Also, the fact that the earliest MSS of the Metamorphoses are from the 11th century is *normal* for works of Classical Latin literature. There are a few exceptions (e.g., the Aeneid), for which we have surviving Late Antique or Early Medieval MSS, but for the vast majority of Latin works, we have no surviving MSS prior to the Carolingian Renaissance.

Oh, and Petrus Berchorius wrote the Ovidius Moralizatus in the 14th Century, not in Late Antiquity - so it is actually *later* than the supposedly "very late" 11th century MS. (This fact can be ascertained simply by clicking the link for his name.) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.31.47.139 (talk) 14:29, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

(Signed by Bot) Deleting isn't editing. Perhaps a more responsible, logged-in editor will want to improve this section.--Wetman (talk) 22:44, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wow. Forgive me for being a non-logged-in-editor. I was under the impression that deleting fabrications was something that might improve the general quality of the article. The whole "Ovid was frowned on in Late Antiquity" line that is used here is false - no Classicist currently living subscribes to it. So it didn't seem that it was worthy of reply. This time I added a sentence about the consistent popularity of Ovid in Late Antiquity from the preface of the new Tarrant OCT of the Met. Hopefully that will not be reverted. 66.31.47.139 (talk) 16:28, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not being logged it is not a problem in itself, but blanking without an explanation (i.e. edit summary) can look suspicious. I recommend you start adding comments so we can be sure of the intent. (John User:Jwy talk) 22:22, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The first rambling, silly part of this section is directly contradicted by the strightforward second part. Are we really to assume that Jerome's and Augustine's critiques of the work amount to attempts at censorship? Deleting it would indeed be an improvement. At a minimum sources that do not contradict what is being asserted should be required to keep it. Rwflammang (talk) 18:31, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Outside this article, it is alleged that "Metamorphoses" contains sagas attached to the constellations. If true, perhaps it should be added of someone knowledgeable enough, perhaps. (Not me, not yet, I'm not knowledgeable!) ... said: Rursus (^mbork³) 12:51, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In September 30, 2009, I applied the article Metamorfoses in wikipedia in Portuguese in a featured article, and I did. If you could take a look at the article, maybe you like this, without even understand my language. I would be immensely happy if a group of editors of Wikipedia in English willing to upgrade this article in the wiki en. as we did in the wiki pt., because of its artistic importante. Thank you very much. Auréola (talk) 22:48, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

nn sa na vas pas il faut mettre les chanes  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.236.254.207 (talk) 14:53, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply] 

I realize that Ovid was a Roman, but was the Metamorphoses originally written in Latin or Greek (as the language of culture)?TCO (talk) 20:57, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Latin. Deor (talk) 21:01, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed one link to a site that was a domain for sale and one inappropriate insertion. Is there more work needed before the request for cleanup can be removed?

I work many hours each day in Japanese, but I could not see keeping this link for en.wiki

 http://ovidmeta.jp/search/p/index.php

as there are other links which are more accessible and there is fr.wikipedia.org for French text.

G. Robert Shiplett 20:28, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

There should be more information on the Moralized Metamorphoses and societies influence on their origin.Alexisolson (talk) 18:21, 4 September 2015 (UTC)alexisolson[reply]

Alexisolson Write it, then. You're an editor! Ogress _smash! 21:10, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The page does currently exist, but only in French. S.C. Kaplan (talk) 19:34, 8 September 2015 (UTC)User:S.C.Kaplan[reply]

The lead-sentence of the article

However, the word "Morpheus" is not even mentioned once here in Metamorphoses. This seems rather odd. -- Rfassbind – talk 14:12, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Morpheus appears in the story of

Ceyx and Alcyone in Book XI. Since he isn't really the focus of the story, I don't see any particular reason to mention him specifically in this article. Deor (talk) 14:45, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

I have just modified one external link on Metamorphoses. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090601062538/http://special.lib.gla.ac.uk/exhibns/chaucer/influences.html to http://special.lib.gla.ac.uk/exhibns/chaucer/influences.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:37, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Below the external links, I added a portal bar. What do you think?
Adèle Fisher (talk) 20:34, 1 March 2018 (UTC).[reply]