Talk:Michael Levine (biologist)

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Science and Academia This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the science and academia work group. California: San Francisco Bay Area Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by San Francisco Bay Area task force (assessed as Low-importance).

• Lots of significant papers. I cited the homeobox & eve-stripe 2 papers and am adding some of the big hits from google scholar. --Lquilter (talk) 19:13, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Disambiguation note: There is a different Michael S. Levine who is a physician doing medical research on Parkinson's, Huntington's, etc. The mouse knockout papers are this other levine. --Lquilter (talk) 04:14, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• User blanked the "notable papers" list, noting that it is better to describe them in the text. (A) I would quarrel with that -- it is convention to include a bibliography of notable works with scholars, writers, artists, etc. Regardless, until and unless the papers are discussed in the article, they need to be there. (B) They are not randomly selected papers; they were the papers listed in google scholar with most hits (100+). --Lquilter (talk) 14:47, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Not sure why the current set of doctoral students was selected. The adding editor noted these are faculty students. However, Levine has many, many more faculty "graduates" of his lab -- quite a few considerably more highly cited than these listed. Still, leaving it for now. --Lquilter (talk) 14:53, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Actually turns out most of those were postdocs in Levine lab, not grad students. Took them out. If there's a postdoc field for the infobox template, that's where they should go (but again, there are other significant postdocs, e.g., Rushlow, Stathopoulous, etc., who would probably be cited too). --Lquilter (talk) 02:27, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Michael Levine (biologist). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120722011217/http://nas.nasonline.org/site/PageServer?pagename=AWARDS_molbio to http://nas.nasonline.org/site/PageServer?pagename=AWARDS_molbio

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:31, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]