Talk:Michael Steinberg (music critic)
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Weasle words, characterizations, and edit wars
Having witnessed the recent edits by IP 96.233.44.231 and
original research, which in my view is worse than weasel words. IP 96.233.44.231, what you may not be aware of is that wikipedia has policies on making critical judgements. As editors we can't put forth our own evaluations on a particular person's art, writing, etc. To do so is against policy. What we can do, is quote or summarize the evaluations of other authoratative sources with propper attribution. TJD3 was right to remove the statements he did as they were unsourced opinions added by IP 72.93.248.20. This article certainly need not be bland though, and it could use some evaluation of Steinberg's work. I would suggest trying to find some published sources on Steinberg, either in books or periodicals/newspapers, and add some quotes.4meter4 (talk) 12:48, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
]
- It more of a WP:PEACOCK for how to inject commentary like this into an article by quoting other people. Much praise was written about Steinberg when he died. Finding good quotes should be like shooting fish in a barrel. Here are three obits found with a simple google search: [1][2][3]. There's probably more.DavidRF (talk) 03:07, 19 July 2010 (UTC)]