Talk:Mike Huckabee 2016 presidential campaign

Howdy.   So I have had nothing but trouble trying to get this article going. I asked to have a discussion on the tp before further action was taken, but that was ignored so I'll do it. Looking at

I want to add that we should stick the the

Status Quo while this discussion takes place. For Clinton, Rubio, Carson and now Huckabee, we have started the articles as soon as we knew there was an announcement planned. If another user, citing policy, makes a counterargument to have the article remain a redirect, I am happy to entertain it. Until then... PrairieKid (talk) 01:11, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

Finally, I would like to say his [1] is one giant countdown to the announcement. PrairieKid (talk) 15:13, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment At present, I think it's fairly clear this article violates
  WP:CRYSTAL. As soon as he announces he's running, it should be fine, but until that is confirmed, there's no reason for an article. Number 57 10:08, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply
  ]

I think

WP:CRYSTAL implies that there is no knowledge that it is happening and that it is pure speculation. All media sources are reporting as if he was making the announcement and there is nothing to indicate he isn't. PrairieKid (talk) 02:12, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

To add to that, WP:CRYSTAL talks specifically about the 2016 election and says that if an event passes

WP:CRYSTAL if "the event is notable and almost certain to take place... If preparation for the event is not already in progress, speculation about it must be well documented." I think it totally passes that. PrairieKid (talk) 02:14, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

The

United States presidential election, 2016 article passes WP:CRYSTAL. However, that argument doesn't apply to this article, which is about a possible campaign that has not actually been declared yet. Number 57 07:32, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

But that's not what

WP:CRYSTAL requires. The page talks specifically about 2016 campaigns and that it passes crystal if it is notable and almost certain to take place. You'd be hard presses to find someone who does not think he is announcing on May 5. PrairieKid (talk) 16:36, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

WP:CRYSTAL does not talk specifically about 2016 campaigns – it mentions only the election. Why can't you wait two weeks until it's confirmed or not? Number 57 10:25, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think PrairieKid has a made a solid case for letting the article stand on its own. The sources strongly suggest that a Huckabee candidacy is inevitable. On the other hand, I understand that the announcement is still 2 weeks away so it does seem a little soon to start an article about a campaign that hasn't officially started yet. Is it doable to temporarily name the article "Mike Huckabee impending presidential campaign, 2016" then remove "impending" from the title after the announcement is made? That might make for a "happy medium". Just an idea.--Pnu15 (talk) 19:40, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

He may very well stand and have a campaign that does not reach what you ex-colonials call first base. Still

WP:TOOSOON, and will be until there is more to say than can be mentioned in a para in his biog. At the moment Huckabee is just a wannabe.TheLongTone (talk) 12:14, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

WP:TOOSOON, patience, folks. - Cwobeel (talk) 16:55, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

• TOOSOON It doesn't exist yet. It will almost certainly exist but it's not unreasonable to suggest waiting until the campaign exists to put it in an encyclopedia. At the moment there's little to say but that he will almost certainly be running. That merits a section on his own page not an article. SPACKlick (talk) 13:28, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]