Talk:Modh

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

India: Gujarat Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Gujarat (assessed as Low-importance). This article was last assessed in April 2012. An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article. Jainism Stub‑class Low‑importance This article is part of WikiProject Jainism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Jainism. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page for more details on the projects. Guidelines: project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 18:46, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to me that the article's text is the same as the text in the following link:
[Page cannot be found anymore (404), this was retrieved from Google's cache]

http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:bASMgvFMWR0J:modhgandhisamaj.com/1_7_Modh-s-Origin-and-Now-.html Ilias K., Greece 08:59, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

I found this article through reference to “Modh” in Mahatma Gandhi. In my opinion this article is of extremely low quality, but I have neither a specific idea how to nor the cultural background/knowledge to improve it. For example:

• MediaWiki markup is used in the wrong way
• the term ”Amba Maa” is referred to, but not explained (and not found in Wikipedia)
• most statements are unsourced hearsay as evidenced by e.g. “it is believed” and “some journalists have suggested”
• the text is generally incoherent, appears to digress from the lemma and is gibberish in large parts (particularly the last paragraph)
• the major edit that led to the current version might constitute vandalism based on a copy from a now-perished source

--PointedEars (talk) 17:10, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]