Talk:Moga, Punjab

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: no consensus that the Punjab city is the primary topic. Jenks24 (talk) 01:10, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 23:01, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• @
  Filpro: Or should the plain name continue to be the disambig? Anthony Appleyard (talk) 23:01, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The other contested major use of Moga seems to be

talk) 00:09, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

• Procedural revert move the disambiguation page back to the base name, since this is an improperly formatted multimove. -- 70.51.44.60 (talk) 07:07, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment the existence of Moga district also in Punjab would suggest that the article's current name is bad, and instead should be Moga (city), Punjab -- 70.51.44.60 (talk) 07:07, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  You clearly don't understand the naming standards for sub-state entities.

  talk) 23:36, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply

  ]

• Oppose per
  primary topics, even when no criteria have been defined. George Ho (talk) 05:31, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply
  ]

  According to

  talk) 23:44, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply

  ]

• Oppose no primary exists. In ictu oculi (talk) 13:15, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  Please elaborate.

  talk) 23:35, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply

  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.