Talk:Monaco–European Union relations

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

European Union Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject European Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the European Union on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European UnionWikipedia:WikiProject European UnionTemplate:WikiProject European UnionEuropean Union articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. European Microstates: Monaco Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject European Microstates, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of European Microstates on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European MicrostatesWikipedia:WikiProject European MicrostatesTemplate:WikiProject European MicrostatesEuropean Microstates articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Monaco. project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

On October 2013, it was proposed that this article be moved from Monaco–European Union relations to European Union–Monaco relations. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

There is a move discussion in progress on

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Georgia–European Union relations which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 09:46, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Monaco–European Union relations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130517000353/http://ue.eu.int/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/trans/134524.pdf to http://ue.eu.int/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/trans/134524.pdf
• Added archive https://archive.is/20130413223348/http://www.klassekampen.no/61007/article/item/null to http://www.klassekampen.no/61007/article/item/null
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140307181930/http://www.latribunasammarinese.net/edizioni/2013/01-gennaio/03-01-2013boiw.pdf to http://www.latribunasammarinese.net/edizioni/2013/01-gennaio/03-01-2013boiw.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:15, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]