Talk:Monica Larner

This article was nominated for deletion on 30 November 2013. The result of the discussion was keep.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Women writers Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view. MonicaLarner (talk · contribs) / Monica Larner Monica Larner

The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view. WineDWS (talk · contribs) / Monica Larner Monica Larner

This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... (I am the new Italian reviewer for the Wine Advocate) --MonicaLarner (talk) 19:24, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Because it is true. I am the new Italian Reviewer for the Wine Advocate.

@

reliable sources

. Your article bascially had one sentence that stated you are an American wine critic and a reviewier for The Wine Advocate, and then a quote from the publisher of the The Wine Advocate saying how great you are (which is not independent). Therefore, at this time, a stand-alone article was not justified.

Also, please read through WP:Autobiography to see why creating an article about yourself is generally not a great idea... Singularity42 (talk) 23:34, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If not already in the article, some source material for the article might be: [1], [2] -- Jreferee (talk) 15:26, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]