Talk:Mortuary Temple of Ramesses III

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Untitled

Please see http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Merlin-UK for higher res Egyptian photographs —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.102.91.145 (talk) 19:06, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on

Medinet Habu (temple). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ
for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:10, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 13 February 2022

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved.

Medinet Habu (temple) to Mortuary Temple of Ramesses III (closed by non-admin page mover) TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 11:24, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply
]


Medinet Habu (location). This one has bothered me for some time; I have spent many years trying to verify the two-article split we have had since these articles were created almost-simultaneously by two different editors in 2005. We still have no sources justifying the split. Having just visited the place I can confirm that there really is only one place known as Medinet Habu. I think the confusion stems from the fact that there was once a village on the grounds of the temple,[1] presumably the same one in which the Coptic church once stood, but this has not existed for a long time. Onceinawhile (talk) 14:14, 13 February 2022 (UTC) Onceinawhile (talk) 14:14, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

  • Support. There are several noteworthy monuments at the site, and the temple of Ramesses III is by far the most significant. But right now Wikipedia doesn't say a whole lot about the temple, so merging the temple article with the general article about the site is entirely practical.
If, at some point in the future, the content about the temple does expand enough that a split is justified, the article on the temple should be titled "Mortuary Temple of Ramesses III", not "Medinet Habu (temple)". Note that at
Mortuary Temple of Hatshepsut, the more precise term. A. Parrot (talk) 17:24, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply
]
Thanks A. Parrot. I agree with you. Also pinging Mr rnddude who has been working very hard on the Hatshepsut temple article. I visited that yesterday as well. Given how significant the Hatshepsut temple has become post its restoration, the term Deir el-Bahari is rarely used in guidebooks and similar literature any more. But when it is, it is always talks about the three temples, as you suggest. That is different for "Medinet Habu", as even scholarly sources differ as to whether the other two temples are part of it or adjacent to it… As an unrelated aside, my lasting feeling from Hatshepsut’s temple is that it has been almost completely rebuilt (new ceilings, walls, pillars etc) – I think that is the many decades' work of the Polish mission, who are still there now. If so, our article currently underplays the enormous transformation resulting from their work. Onceinawhile (talk) 20:59, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - as practical. I suspect that a split could be justified if someone was willing to spend the time to write a comprehensive article on Ramesses III's mortuary temple (under a more appropriate title, as mentioned by A. Parrot), but currently and into the foreseeable future the disambiguation page links to two start-up articles with basically overlapping coverage. Do prune the gallery though when merging as it is rather excessive at 28 (32 in-article total) for less than 500 words of prose. Thanks for the ping. Mr rnddude (talk) 08:49, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.