Talk:Mystic Meg

A news item involving Mystic Meg was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 10 March 2023.

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Arts and Entertainment This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group. Astrology Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astrology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Astrology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AstrologyWikipedia:WikiProject AstrologyTemplate:WikiProject Astrologyastrology articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

I thought that this article would be longer than this! Saccerzd 16:56, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well I hardly doubt she has a huge cult following. 82.69.80.20

I'm surprised she doesn't to be honest, there are people less deserving (I know hard to imagine but it's true). --Hellahulla 16:09, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes But she was quit famous during her lottery days Andrewjd 07:25, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm surprised this has a {{notability}} tag on it. Mystic Meg is almost notable enough to be in a dictionary. --Montchav (talk) 14:19, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

+++++ Just for the record there is no such word as 'astrologist' I have changed it to the correct word= astrologer. best wishes Veryscarymary (talk) 19:32, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Any details of husband or family life? 86.147.127.190 (talk) 17:37, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

She died with 7 cats. I think you can draw your own conclusions. 2604:2D80:6305:600:50AF:3D83:76E8:195E (talk) 12:25, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lake never married, not even one of that cats it seems, as confirmed here. That may be a useful source in itself. Martinevans123 (talk) 12:49, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Frank Pilkington has just replaced her as The Sun's astrologer. Has she retired or defected to another paper? Digifiend (talk) 15:06, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Would be interesting to find out why The Sun ended her contract? She has been writing for that paper for at least 20 years... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.41.255.118 (talk) 11:07, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Considering her age (she's in her 70s), maybe she just retired. By choice. We don't know that The Sun wanted to get rid of her. Hence my above question. Digifiend (talk) 02:11, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A FreeBMD search reveals: this, which is consistent with a birth in Accrington: [1]. Martinevans123 (talk) 11:37, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]