Talk:Nå skruva Fiolen

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Good articleNå skruva Fiolen has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 20, 2022Good article nomineeListed

GA Review

This review is . The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 16:19, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Good Article
review progress box
WP:CV
()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4.
free or tagged images
()
6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the
Good Article criteria. Criteria marked
are unassessed

I will undertake this review tomorrow. --K. Peake 16:19, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Super, thanks! Chiswick Chap (talk) 16:22, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox and lead

  • Infobox looks good!
    • Thanks.
  • "and mimics the rhythm" → "and mimicking the rhythm"
    • Done.
  • "and certainly pretended to play it" → "certainly pretending to play it"
    • Done.
  • Use double speech marks instead for "screw"
    • Done.
  • Add a sentence mentioning Fred Åkerström's recording at the end of the lead, as this is notable
    • Done.

Background

  • Good
    • Noted.

Epistle

Music and verse form

  • Add relevant text to the audio sample to justify its usage
    • Done.
  • Wikilink cello
    • Done.
  • Pipe 2
    4
    time to Duple and quadruple metre
    • Done.
  • Wikilink timbre
    • Not done, the article is about the quality of a tone, not the meaning here.
  • "on the 3rd and 4th lines," → "on the third and fourth lines," per
    MOS:NUM
    • Done.

Lyrics

  • Img looks good!
    • Noted.
  • "It is subtitled" → "The composition is subtitled" to avoid overusage of it
    • Done.
  • Remove commas around Paul Britten Austin
    • Done.
  • Versions of the start of Epistle No. 2 → Starting lines of Epistle No. 2
    • Done.

Reception and legacy

Notes

  • Shouldn't there be sources for the info of the notes since they are not mentioning anything corresponding with refs next to them?
    • Added.

References

  • Copyvio score is undetectable at 0%!!!!
    • Noted.
  • Shouldn't ref 10 be cited in place of ref 6 since that also invokes p. 63?
    • Noted, but ref 6 is more specific, which is better for its task.
  • Cite Bellman.net as publisher instead on ref 9
    • Done.
  • WP:OVERLINK
    of Fred Åkerström on ref 15
    • Done.
  • Pipe WEA Records to Warner Music Group and fix WP:OVERLINK of Fred Åkerström on ref 16
    • Done.
  • Pipe Sterling to Sterling Records (Sweden) on ref 17
    • Done.

Sources

  • Good
    • Thanks.

External links

  • Shouldn't you write on YouTube after the links to the videos?
    • Done.

Final comments and verdict

  •  Pass now, quick response once again! --K. Peake 07:06, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]