Talk:NEWS (band)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Good article nominee
Listed
October 18, 2017Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article

Dramas, Movies, Radio Shows and a portion of Commercial section Removed

The sections/catagories above had been removed. A NEWS article should only display information concerning the group as a whole or involving the majority of the group (unless it is relatively general in nature). Detailed, solo achievements and works of the members should not be in this article, but in the individual's respective Wikipedia article. Refer to articles of other Johnny's groups (like KinKi Kids) and you'll know what i mean. -- Frozencrumbz 08:59, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Renaming Page

This article has been renamed many times and I believe that comments should be provided alongside clear reasons for the changes in this Talk Page. This will avoid people renaming it back and fro.

The official way to write the band's name is 'NEWS'; in capital letters. This band is not a trademark and therefore, rules regarding the naming of trademarks should not be applied to this article.

WP:TITLE
states that conventionally, this article should be named 'News (band)' but does not endorse this as a must-have rule.

I hereby propose to rename this page "NEWS (band)". If no one disagrees to this name in three days, then I will rename it. Until them, this issue will be open for discussion and no name changes shall be made. Frozencrumbz 03:00, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

See
WP:MUSTARD#Capitalization. - Cyrus XIII 13:52, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply
]
Alright then. Even if rules regarding trademarks do apply to band names, it is clearly stated that exceptions are acceptable. If you look at NEWS' Japanese, Chinese, French, Indonesian, Thai, French, etc Wikipedia pages, all of them have applied capitalisation to the band's name. Isn't this proof that NEWS is globally recognised in its capitalised form? Why should the English Wikipedia defy common sense? Frozencrumbz 00:18, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Because deferring to exceptions that easily would defeat the purpose of having any sort of style guide in the first place. - Cyrus XIII 02:05, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Sayaendoregular.jpg

fair use
.

Please go to

Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline
is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

talk) 05:58, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Fair use rationale for Image:Akakuregular.jpg

fair use
.

Please go to

Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline
is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

talk) 19:51, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Fair use rationale for Image:Cherishregular.jpg

fair use
.

Please go to

Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline
is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

talk) 20:05, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Fair use rationale for Image:Pacificregular.jpg

fair use
.

Please go to

Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline
is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

talk) 22:41, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Fair use rationale for Image:Nipponregular.jpg

fair use
.

Please go to

Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline
is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

talk) 22:42, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Fair use rationale for Image:Hwmregular.jpg

fair use
.

Please go to

Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline
is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

talk) 23:06, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Fair use rationale for Image:Teppenregular.jpg

fair use
.

Please go to

Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline
is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

talk) 09:17, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Comments

From the quick copyedit I did to the "History" section:

  • I added a {{
    fact
    }}     tag in the first half of the section; it is important that you add a source for that statement before the GA review starts, as some people will not pass an article with any dispute/cleanup tags on it.
 Done
  • The first section (2005-2006) reads almost more like a list than prose...it pretty much lists singles and albums released, with news about the two underage drinkers mixed in. Would it be possible to give it a little more structure (by both summarizing the singles stuff without necessarily listing all of it, and moving the stuff about the drinkers to a separate paragraph)? I don't know how important it is to keep an intact "timeline" of when the various suspensions happened relative to when various singles came out.
Summarize it how? Also moving the members, I'll try it but I have a feeling it's going to look messy or whatever because not much was really reported and that would only be like two-three sentences, not a full paragraph.
  • On a similar note...I think the 2007-2008 section goes into more detail than necessary. We probably don't need to know the specifics of each concert, when they were postponed, etc.
Kept the thing about the first tour since that was event that marked their return.
  • Lots of mention of songs debuting "at the top of" charts...does this mean #1, or just somewhere high up? Might help to clarify (and to mix up the language a bit as well).
    • Actually, after reading the last sentence of this section, it does look like you meant they were all #1...still, it would be nice to be clearer on that from the beginning.
Should be clearer now.

Hope this helps, rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 01:28, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for copy editing. ~Moon~
と暁~Sunrise~ 03:30, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

What about their new song Koi no ABO/ —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.166.105.201 (talk) 00:20, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved to

News (band). This looks unusual; I'd have preferred NEWS (band) if it was up to me. There was no agreement on whether NEWS qualifies as an acronym here, so the automatic capitalization expected for acronyms may not apply. This band's choice of a common word for their name prevents us from finding actual usage in English by Google searches, as explained by Labattblueboy. I have made NEWS into a redirect to News (disambiguation) though that might be considered further on the talk page. EdJohnston (talk) 03:49, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply
]


MOS:MUSIC. I'm agnostic as to whether NEWS should continue to redirect here or to News as an {{R from other capitalisation}}. Also not sure about the album NEWS Best. BDD (talk) 16:59, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on

nobots
|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—

Talk to my owner:Online 11:29, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

GA Reassessment

This discussion is
transcluded from Talk:NEWS (band)/GA2
. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.

Article clearly no longer meets the

Manual of Style, and various other obvious issues. I will allow a grace period of one week for improvements to this article. If concerns are not addressed by the end of that week, this article will be delisted. ℯxplicit 06:23, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

A week has passed since initiating this review, and no improvements were made. As a result, this article will be delisted. ℯxplicit 06:26, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on NEWS (band). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:43, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 9 external links on NEWS (band). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:40, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:1:43 (band) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 03:23, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:1:43 (band) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 10:27, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:NEWS_(band)&oldid=1207199049"