Talk:Nadeem Anjum

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Military This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the military biography work group. Pakistan Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is written in Pakistani English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, travelled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• DG ISI Nadeem Anjum.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:08, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please let me remove controversy as per statue, i request humbly everyone to please do not add controversy. CPPConstruct (talk) 05:18, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@

Wikipedia is written from a neutral point of view, so we must include a balanced amount of negative content on every subject. ⟲ Three Sixty! ^Talk? _Work. 05:26, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

The controversy will not benefit the national image, it will produce a negative image. so therefore, it should be removed. CPPConstruct (talk) 05:31, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@

whitewash articles. Read the link in my above comment. ⟲ Three Sixty! ^Talk? _Work. 05:33, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

Despite efforts to revert these edits and maintain the accuracy, the frequency and severity of vandalism have escalated, necessitating stronger measures to ensure its protection. As such, I request that the Wikipedia page be placed under protection lock to prevent further modifications. Atif ahmad8 (talk) 06:37, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]