Talk:Nana Komatsu

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved  — Amakuru (talk) 13:47, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Oppose Actress is not primary topic. The character from Nana has been around much longer and been in the anime series and multiple live-action movies. Article does not even explain why the live-action Komatsu is famous. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 06:34, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Support the character is not even notable enough for its own article. A hatnote on top of the person's article pointing to the "List of characters" article is sufficient. AtHomeIn神戸 (talk) 02:26, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Support the actress has a standalone article, unlike the character.--Prisencolin (talk) 21:05, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Oppose – the existence of an article is not very good support for the primarytopic claim. The character may very well be about equally or more prominent. Dicklyon (talk) 02:55, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I think it is worth having a link to the about the character before it was redirected in 2013. 1,700 words without a suggestion of notability. AtHomeIn神戸 (talk) 03:13, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Support - The actress receives four time the page views of not only the
  WP:TWODABS situation. The character can be linked in a hat note as effectively as from a dab page.--Cúchullain ^t/c 19:52, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Support per Cuchullain. This appears to be the clear primary topic. Nohomersryan (talk) 20:52, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.