Talk:Nanchang Q-5

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

China Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Aviation: Aircraft This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met This article is supported by the aircraft project. Military history: Aviation / Asian / Chinese This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces: /  Military aviation task force Asian military history task force Chinese military history task force

From the article: "Plans for an upgraded Q-5/A-5 with Western equipment and new navigation and attack (nav/attack) systems were largely aborted following the Tiananmen Square protests of 1989, but the aircraft continues in service." What is the link between the Tiananmen Square protests and not upgrading a jet fighter? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.228.71.21 (talk) 07:56, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Tech ban prevents western equipment from going to China. Same story with Super-7. That doesn't mean there's no domestic upgrades tho. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.183.131.140 (talk) 07:09, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

according to Chinese source,the 317A radar was never produced in any number except those for experiment,also there was never source in China to veify this carrier. http://www.zgjunshi.com/Article/Class38/Class78/Class86/200410/20041019144523.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.57.104.172 (talk) 12:24, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Nanchang Q-5/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following

Last edited at 01:13, 11 January 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 00:49, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Nanchang Q-5. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100116100259/http://www.sinodefence.com/airforce/groundattack/q5.asp to http://www.sinodefence.com/airforce/groundattack/q5.asp
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110226111211/http://www.airforceworld.com/pla/q-5-a-5-striker-china.htm to http://airforceworld.com/pla/q-5-a-5-striker-china.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:23, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]