Talk:Nauru Regional Processing Centre

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

According to [1], there were just 2 asylum seekers left in November 2005 --Fred Bradstadt 22:19, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on

nobots
|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—

Talk to my owner:Online 09:06, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on

nobots
|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{

Sourcecheck
}}).

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—

Talk to my owner:Online 01:10, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Nauru Regional Processing Centre. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{

Sourcecheck
}}).

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—

Talk to my owner:Online 11:43, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

Conditions v Access

I added a paragraph on the current conditions based upon a primary source. That source has been removed and a new section created discussing media access. While some of the points I listed from the primary source are mentioned, not all are, and the source itself is ignored in favour of a non-primary source that contradicts the original article. I was under the impression Wikipedia preferred original\primary sources? I don't want to see an edit war started so rather than do anything now I'll just raise the points here. I do think something needs to be added to the conditions section as the impression a reader is left with is that conditions are very very bad, which contradicts the latest report. 人族 (talk) 03:53, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

A story about conditions here aired on NPR's Morning Edition this morning. Part 2 is tomorrow.

Several other sources have come out about it in the last couple weeks, too: SMH, BBC, Guardian, NY Times... — Rhododendrites talk \\ 13:03, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]