Talk:New South Wales Rugby League

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

This page is in need of a tidy up. I have started by moving all of the information specific to the NSWRL premiership to its own page. This page is specific to the organisation. Is there anyone out there who wants to lend a hand on a tidy up/rewrite?--dan, dan and dan 09:47, 7 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe I'm just being thick, but I can't see alink to the new page anywhere. Grinner 10:18, 7 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe I'm being thicker, but it looks like I forgot to include it! :) --dan, dan and dan 11:46, 7 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
ta!Grinner 13:37, 7 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Hi All... Just letting you know that I've created a Jim Beam Cup entry (which links from/to this page, obviously) - I've also included the RL in Australia template at the bottom. Have a look and let me know what you think. As you may appreciate, it's very difficutlt to get info/stats on this competition and it's second division predecessors (but I've managed). User:CumberlandsAshes81 9:25, 23 January 2006 (UTC)

City vs Country

I'm a Queenslander so not really knowledgeable in the matter, but is the City team administered by the NSWRL? On the City vs Country page their logo appears as the city team's logo. If they are, might be worth a mention here on the NSWRL's article?--

Jeff79 01:50, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

I'm pretty sure they are, i could be wrong though. CEP78 01:51, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Nswrl 1988.jpg

fair use
.

Please go to

Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline
is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:27, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Royal Agricultural Society Shield

I've merged the stub sized article from here Royal Agricultural Society Shield onto the main NSWRL page because I think the more info we have here the better, not to mention I was worried it might've been deleted. Bongomanrae (talk) 12:36, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on New South Wales Rugby League. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{

Sourcecheck
}}).

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:55, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


POV Check

I have flagged this for a POV check, particularly the section about the Winfield Cup, which sounds like PR talk and should be reworded for NPOV - as an alternative we could use a quote from a source stating the trophy's mystical qualities, rather than having this stated as a primary source. According to whom tags have been placed for a couple of the opening statements in the NSWRL section as well. Note that I have not changed the main text at this stage; I figure that should happen after this is reviewed. Graham (talk) 03:29, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]