Talk:New York Watercolor Club

This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Visual arts This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles Low This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

New York City Low‑importance

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles Low This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The contents of the New York Watercolor Club page were merged into American Watercolor Society on 14 October 2018 and it now redirects there. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history.

The NY Watercolor Club became the American Watercolor Society. They are the same group with different names. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:08, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. I think that although the NY Watercolor Club is the superior article, it should be folded into the AWS article. The American Watercolor Society is the current and most widely recognized name for the organization. I have never participated in a merger and am not sure of the protocol. Will read up on it. Librarianhelen (talk) 20:49, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I also agree with the proposed merger and that the AWS should take precedence as the currently existing org. Alafarge (talk) 18:29, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  Y Merger complete. Klbrain (talk) 22:19, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]