Talk:Niccolò de' Niccoli

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles Libraries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LibrariesWikipedia:WikiProject LibrariesTemplate:WikiProject LibrariesLibraries articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Latin Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latin, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Latin on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LatinWikipedia:WikiProject LatinTemplate:WikiProject LatinLatin articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Italy Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

	Middle Ages Low‑importance
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The purpose of this information is to provide connections of Niccolo de' Niccoli to Poggio Bracciolini, and the alleged forgery of Tacitus and other works by the hand of Poggio, as is considered by Hochart and Ross, who wrote about the forgery in the 19th century CE as well as infomation which can be found within the Fomenko books. For more information about their proofs, a selected group of sites can be seen at; http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&ie=UTF-8&rlz=1T4ADBR_enUS315US315&q=hochart+and+ross More information can be found in Chapter I, "History: Fiction or Science?, Vol. I", p. 26-26.69.92.23.64 (talk) 14:03, 29 September 2009 (UTC)Ronald L. Hughes[reply]

Are you prohibited from suggesting that Nicolli and Poggio were involved in the manufacture of forged documents, that were reported to be from ancient times? There is plenty of information available! Perhaps you should inquire about Horchart and Ross, who were amongst the first to allege such forgeries actually occured?69.92.23.64 (talk) 22:08, 18 May 2010 (UTC)Ronald L. Hughes[reply]