Talk:Nig Clarke

Nig Clarke has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: March 12, 2014. (Reviewed version).

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Sports and Games This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the sports and games work group (assessed as Low-importance). Baseball: Hall of Fame / Phillies Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Baseball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of baseball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BaseballWikipedia:WikiProject BaseballTemplate:WikiProject BaseballBaseball articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Hall of Fame task force. This article is supported by WikiProject Philadelphia Phillies (assessed as Low-importance).

If his wife said "He burst onto the scence already a legend," are we to assume that he was also an "unwashed phenomenon"? Obviously, this was a couple of light years ago. Diamonds & Rust — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.216.154.32 (talk) 20:24, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This review is

transcluded from Talk:Nig Clarke/GA1

. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Secret (talk · contribs) 20:47, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'll review this article this week. Secret ^account 20:47, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I really don't see much wrong with this article that prevents it from not getting GAN, so I'll just pass this. Secret ^account 19:45, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]