Talk:No. 79 Squadron RAAF

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Featured articleNo. 79 Squadron RAAF is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on April 25, 2022.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 5, 2011Good article nomineeListed
March 9, 2011WikiProject A-class reviewApproved
July 10, 2011Featured article candidatePromoted
Current status: Featured article

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on No. 79 Squadron RAAF. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:09, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on No. 79 Squadron RAAF. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:06, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on No. 79 Squadron RAAF. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:59, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

URFA/2020

Looking at this as part of

WP:URFA/2020. I believe this one is satisfactory, and will be marking as such, but the statement " and No. 79 Squadron is scheduled to begin operations with these aircraft in mid-2017" needs to be updated. Hog Farm Talk 00:40, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

@Hog Farm: Many thanks for this. I've just made that update. Searching for recent news stories doesn't return anything really of interest - as a training squadron with a stable role and highly reliable aircraft, this isn't the most exciting unit in the RAAF. Nick-D (talk) 10:32, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]