Talk:Nothofagus gunnii

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.


Move to Fuscospora gunnii

The species Nothofagus gunnii has been moved to the new species Fuscospora gunnii[1]

Should this page be moved and a redirect from this page be created?Its-mrb (talk) 03:11, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Moved - Its-mrb (talk) 05:40, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

References

Content needing to be copied from draft article

I've just stumbled upon the following article that was drafted up regarding F. Gunni but which was rejected, mainly because this article already existed.

Would an author with more expertise on this species like to review the content of the draft article with an eye to transferring the relevant material not already covered?

Link is here: Draft:Fuscospora_gunnii — Preceding unsigned comment added by Its-mrb (talkcontribs) 05:50, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

New genera

The new genera (Lophozonia, Fuscospora etc.) have not been accepted outside New Zealand. For example, see:

https://biodiversity.org.au/nsl/services/search?product=APC&tree.id=51209179&name=Fuscospora+gunnii+%28Hook.f.%29+Heenan+%26+Smissen&inc._scientific=&inc.scientific=on&inc._cultivar=&max=100&display=apc&search=true

or

https://npgsweb.ars-grin.gov/gringlobal/taxonomydetail.aspx?id=467521

They were New Zealanders, who changed the nomenclature. As Nothofagus exists at least in six countries outside New Zealand (Indonesia, Papua New Guinea, France (New Caledonia), Australia, Chile, Argentina), Nothofagus should still be the genus name in Wikipedia. Thus, all the species articles, at least the species outside New Zealand, should be edited and the old names restored. Probably someone from New Zealand changed the genus names in Wikipedia. Now tree enthusiasts around the world are wondering, what is the valid name. Krasanen (talk) 17:33, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]