Talk:Obsessed (2009 film)

	Obsessed (2009 film) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones Date Process Result October 19, 2011 Good article nominee Not listed December 31, 2011 Good article nominee Not listed January 20, 2012 Good article nominee Not listed April 16, 2014 Good article nominee Listed Current status: Good article

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Beyoncé Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Beyoncé, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Beyoncé on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BeyoncéWikipedia:WikiProject BeyoncéTemplate:WikiProject BeyoncéBeyoncé articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Film: American This article is supported by the American cinema task force. United States: Cinema Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Film - American cinema task force.

What is the name of the son? I can't find him anywhere in the cast list here. unless its the character Patrick.63.168.68.102 (talk) 17:34, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Should the viral marketing campaign be mentioned? Quantalume Wanderer (talk) 01:27, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

u guys i deleted the plot, someone put it all there including spoilers! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.236.175.228 (talk) 19:55, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The plot is so bad. Someone should fix it.... Jabberwockgee (talk) 17:15, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree completely, there are typographical errors all over the place, and many instances of opinion (e.g., she breathes a sigh of relief, glad that the whole ordeal is over.) I would fix it, but I haven't actually seen the film. Somebody who has should fix this, though. 98.228.31.217 (talk) 23:09, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to remove all things that are unnecessary. Granted, I haven't seen it either, so I can't verify that these things happened in the movie, but I can tell when things are unnecessary even if I haven't seen it. Jabberwockgee (talk) 00:09, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, there's even things like "big mistake" in there. I'm quite tempted to replace the whole thing with a short promo synopsis...

Bubbles02 (talk) 00:16, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deftonesderrick made my day by beating me to a massive edit of the plot summary. Since then we've both gone in picking at little details. It's a lot better but another pair of eyes wouldn't hurt if someone feels like taking a look. Millahnna (talk) 01:01, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There is no chance this is an 'erotic thriller.'

Just think of the connotations the word 'erotic' has; they don't match with this film.

Furthermore, the Wikipedia article on erotica describes it as concerning "erotically stimulating or sexually arousing" descriptions; the film does not fall into this category. Regardless of cast members' attractiveness, their actions are not in the 'erotic' realm.

I'd offer as an explanation for why someone listed it as an erotic thriller the fact that Beyonce is popularly recognised as an attractive icon (as is Ali Larter).

If anyone has a good reason to disagree, I'm open to it. But if not I'll change it to a thriller instead. --Sakrotac (talk) 17:22, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I am going to be bold and edit it now. --Sakrotac (talk) 15:09, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That list of vaguely similarly films in "See also" seems wrong to me. Can anyone justify having anything there ? -- Beardo (talk) 13:20, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

They detract from it entirely as several critics that are quoted appear to have failed to appreciate this story's progressive stances. Additionally remove your fake "side theme" of race involved in the altercation between the two main women in the movie. The altercation clearly was about the attempt at harming her son and not about race. I understand that many want race or infidelity in marriage to be main driving factors of the plot, but they simply aren't. 2601:281:CD81:3D70:194C:841C:4D76:BCF8 (talk) 14:02, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]