Talk:Ollo Kambou
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Notability discussion
- Is the Myanmar National League not professional, Joseph2302? If it isn't, our article about it is wrong (not unlikely, I concede!). Cordless Larry (talk) 20:30, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
Ok, Ollo Kambou definitely played in a fully professional league. He has licenses and contracts to prove it. The problem is that he played in two developing countries which don't have a history of documenting anything well, especially on the internet. I have provided numerous pages to show rosters including his name (some even his birthdate) and some of those websites have pictures of him on the webpage. I do not know how to further prove this, and nothing has been fabricated as he played in two fully professional leagues. One in Cote d'Ivoire (one of the best soccer player generating nations in the world with a great, fully professional league). The other being the Myanmar National League. I don't know how to further prove these things with only the internet. But, I feel that I have submitted plenty of proof. I looked at your list of "fully professional" leagues and Cote d'Ivoire is not listed, for some odd reason, but Myanmar is. Yadanarbon FC and Manaw Myay FC are both registered teams in the MNL. He played there for 7 years, and I proved that. I don't understand where all these misunderstandings are coming from. -Kambollo (I don't know how to include the "signature" in this talk page)
- The article attracting critical scrutiny at the draft stage is better than it being nominated for deletion later, Kambollo. I would urge patience for the time being. You sign comments with four tildes (~~~~). Cordless Larry (talk) 21:53, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
That's a good point, I will try to look at the bright side of all of this. I did try the four tildes, but for some reason was told that on this talk page, or something of the sort (this was 12 hours ago and I don't remember the exact message), I couldn't use the tildes. That is why I signed the way I did. Also, I resubmitted the article today after making many changes but then realized that the two places where clarification was needed were not updated. I did update those, and then when I saved the new article, I got another message stating that there had been other edits made simultaneously and there was some type of error. I assumed this was partially due to the edits you all made (for which I am very grateful). In any case, somehow the new article did not update my corrections on those two areas where clarification was requested. I will correct those asap (tomorrow) and resubmit. I will try the four tildes now and hopefully it will work. ~~~~
- @WP:NFOOTY. I've struck previous incorrect comment. Joseph2302 (talk) 12:11, 21 February 2016 (UTC)]
- @
- The article attracting critical scrutiny at the draft stage is better than it being nominated for deletion later, Kambollo. I would urge patience for the time being. You sign comments with four tildes (~~~~). Cordless Larry (talk) 21:53, 20 February 2016 (UTC)