Talk:Operation Babylift

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Military history: Asian / Southeast Asia / Cold War Start‑class This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles Start This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale. This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met Associated task forces: /  Asian military history task force Southeast Asian military history task force Cold War task force (c. 1945 – c. 1989) Aviation This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: | b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> | b2<!--Coverage and accuracy   --> = <yes/no> | b3<!--Structure               --> = <yes/no> | b4<!--Grammar and style       --> = <yes/no> | b5<!--Supporting materials    --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion. Vietnam Low‑importance This article is part of WikiProject Vietnam, an attempt to create a comprehensive, neutral, and accurate representation of Vietnam on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.VietnamWikipedia:WikiProject VietnamTemplate:WikiProject VietnamVietnam articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. United States Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Pritzker Military Library Low‑importance This article is related to the Pritzker Military Museum & Library WikiProject. Please copy assessments of the article from the most major WikiProject template to this one as needed.Pritzker Military LibraryWikipedia:GLAM/PritzkerTemplate:WikiProject Pritzker-GLAMPritzker Military Library-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. inactive .Cold WarWikipedia:WikiProject Cold WarTemplate:WikiProject Cold WarCold War articles

The adoptees who left Vietnam in April, 1975 recently returned to Vietnam for the 30th Anniversary of Babylift. Twenty-one of the 2,548 adoptees, their guests, and many of the Babylift participants were part of this official delegation, recognized by the governments of the United States and Vietnam. This trip marks the first time that such official recognition has been accorded to the Babylift adoptees. Thank you, Lana Noone. [email protected] Plans are underway for the 35th Vietnam "Operation Babylift" Anniversary in 2010. Please contact [email protected] for complete details and all media inquiries. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.117.245.86 (talk) 22:00, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This section is totally unreferenced, and it seems to have been so since it was written. I have tagged it as such and removed a very POV, unreferenced and unencyclopædic statement "News of the plane crash brought widespread attention and sympathy toward the operation and the evacuees in the U.S. and other nations."
The section also differs from the version in the main article, giving different/added details. As these details were added here (In 2008) by an IP w/o refs., there is no way they can be verified. eg "At 50 feet, the throttles where retarded to idle"(no mention in Main story), "The cargo compartment was completely destroyed, killing 141 of the 149 orphans and attendants."(Main story says 76 children died, no mention of 'cargo compartment' at all) etc.
♦ I'll fix it up, if I get a chance, by deleting the un-veverifiable/differing parts, or if not anyone else can! :-))
- 220.101 talk^\Contribs 09:28, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What was the reason for this operation? What threat faced orphans in Saigon? It should be mentioned in an article otherwise it looks like a kidnapping not a rescue operation! 91.77.244.116 (talk) 10:45, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

2nd that. Wonder what kind of law might permit such action. JB. --92.195.31.78 (talk) 02:25, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I also came here to see if there's a section for criticism here, but there's none. Similar actions in the Russian-Ukrainian war have been labeled as kidnapping. Nakonana (talk) 03:33, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Obviously this is a kidnapping, a war crime. It's not even the first time an invader has stolen children - happened to poland. I think it's amazing that there's no mention of the controversy around this incident in the article. Custody disputes were all over the newspapers in the 1970s. It isn't difficult to find stories of "orphans" who were not orphans. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:A442:581E:1:135A:2130:D641:6009 (talk) 02:00, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The "Operation Reunite" section only contains a link to a non-existent (defunct?) website with no other information. Not sure if it should be removed or if there's a way to beef it up with reliable references? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 100.36.32.223 (talk) 00:41, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It still seems to be a 501(c)(3) organization, based in Linwood, NJ.

The

domain extension

has for whatever reason changed

from .org (originally for organizations not clearly falling within the other gTLDs, now unrestricted)

to .com (mainly for commercial entities, but unrestricted)

Trista Goldberg, a Vietnamese adoptee herself, is the founder of Operation Reunite. -> Amerasians - Story of Kien Nguyen and Trista Goldberg. Goldberg was born Nguyen Thi Thu in 1970 in Vietnam. -> Group helps adoptees to trace their heritage

See here for more -> operationreunite.com

--2001:9E8:4635:D226:8767:7E39:7D83:9708 (talk) 12:34, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This article currently says that President Ford announced that the United States would commence stealing babies from Saigon and airlifting them to the US. I doubt very much that the President phased it that way, or that "theft" of these babies was what was intended. I do not know what words were actually used, but I am removing the word "stealing" until someone can come up with a verifiable quote that says what actually happened here. I am sure that the explanation, whatever it is, had a different pretense than outright stealing infants. A loose necktie (talk) 22:22, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have now asked for page protection. Slatersteven (talk) 12:29, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In revision of 02:18, 4 August 2023, the statement that the children were relocated without their consent is removed. Admittedly, there is no explicit statement in the indicated sources confirming this, but bearing in mind these were generally infants and young children in the custody of orphanages that presumably would be ceasing operations, "informed consent" would not realistically have been a plausible option. Fabrickator (talk) 03:57, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]