Talk:Pennsylvania Route 21

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Good articlePennsylvania Route 21 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 4, 2008Good article nomineeListed
June 11, 2013Good article reassessmentKept
Current status: Good article

Pictures

Anyone have any pictures? If not, I guess I'll get some. Deigo (talk) 04:34, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is . The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
here
for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to
    reliable sources): c (OR
    ):
    PA highways, is this a
    WP:RS? Also, could you use an actual direct link for the Google Map, and possibly use the {{cite map
    }} template for citation?
    The PA highways site is used for a lot of Pennsylvania highway articles, so I figured it was reliable. Check it out and let me know if it'll work. If not I'll find something better. I'll work on the map links. Deigo (talk) 14:09, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    Check the
    WP:RS noticeboard, and if they give it the green light, give me the perm link to the approval --Admrb♉ltz (tclog) 14:11, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply
    ]
    Someone said "maybe" Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. It's on the bottom. Deigo (talk) 15:04, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the
    neutral point of view
    policy
    .
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have
    suitable captions
    )
    :
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    Please address the reference issues. On hold. --Admrb♉ltz (tclog) 04:45, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Pass --Admrb♉ltz (tclog) 03:36, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

USRD GA audit

This article has failed the USRD GA audit and will be sent to

WT:USRD for more details, and please ask me if you have any questions as to why this article failed. --Rschen7754 (T C) 07:01, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

GA Reassessment

This discussion is . The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.

Largely the article does not have broad coverage, the lead is too short, and relies on

WP:SPS for the history. I will leave this up for a week for fixes to be made. --Rschen7754 06:59, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

I have redone the history using reliable sources and expanded the lead. Dough4872 01:13, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
GAR has been closed as keep. --Rschen7754 01:18, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]