Talk:Pennsylvania Route 958
 | Pennsylvania Route 958 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
 | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GA Review
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Pennsylvania Route 958/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Rp0211 (talk · contribs) 04:27, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
- herefor what they are not)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (lists):
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
b (citations to ):
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of viewpolicy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Infobox
- No issues
Lead
- No issues
Route description
- No issues
History
- No issues
Major intersections
- No issues
References
- No issues
After thoroughly reviewing this article, I have concluded that it meets the good article criteria at this time. Congratulations and keep up the good work! Rp0211 (talk2me) 04:43, 9 July 2012 (UTC)