Talk:Pepin the Hunchback

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Politics and Government / Royalty and Nobility This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the politics and government work group. This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility. Middle Ages Low‑importance Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers. This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist. [[Charlemagne#Divisio regnorum|divisio regnorum]] The anchor (Divisio regnorum) has been deleted. Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Why the unilateral move from Pepin the Hunchback to here? BrianSmithson 8 July 2005 11:58 (UTC)

Probably because there is a character loosly based on Pepin called Pippin, which would be a very stupid reason indeed. Dwain 20:57, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Should it be moved back? I have consolidated all other articles pertaining to figures of hte same name at Pepin, but I didn't want to propose a move here. I thought perhaps the musical was a good reason to keep this one here as an exception. Srnec 22:17, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If his relatives are all now locted at Pepin the Whatever, then I'd say this guy should be moved too. We should be consistent with our Pippens or our Pepins one way or the other. — Brian (talk) 22:52, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

For reasons cited above, though it doesn't matter much to me whether they are all at Pippin or Pepin, consistency would be nice. And I think Pepin is more common (at least historically) in English than Pippin. Either way, each page should mention the variations. Srnec 04:04, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This article has been renamed from

Hi all, I've made some pretty substantial revisions to the page, 99% of which are additions, all of which are cited. I'm happy to answer any questions but please don't revert the entire document back without discussing. The image that had been at the top of the old page is actually of Pepin of Italy, formerly Carloman, Pepin the Hunchback's younger half-brother; it was mis-cited here. That is the only content that is missing, compared to the old page. Everything else is expansion and addition. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gdrapos (talk • contribs) 03:47, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The two traits are evidence of Church intervention and opposition, as per African-Chinese-Amerindian techniques based on cannibally and coprophagy. The Emperor was to be deprived of a right heir and ruining the health of his son was a strategic move. - djb — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.176.55.30 (talk) 18:42, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]