Talk:Peyton Randolph

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Politics and Government This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the politics and government work group. Virginia C‑class High‑importance High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Surely he is the fist president of the united states then? --90.213.246.167 (talk) 23:34, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No. The United States didn't even exist when he was President of the Continental Congress. Jcb9 (talk) 17:38, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Peyton Randolph was the President of the "Continental Congress". However, the role was not that of Head of State.After 1781 the role was re-titled "President of the United States in Congress Assembled", but still not "President of the Untied States" It was not until after the US constitution in 1789 that the post of US President, as Head of State was formed —Preceding unsigned comment added by Davidbhoy2805 (talk • contribs) 01:28, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As explained by Jcb9 and davidbhoy2805, he is certainly not the first president of the United States and the statement should be removed until anyone can prove with reason otherwise. The closest comparable title under present terms would be Speaker of the House. —Preceding Uspastpresentwatch (talk • contribs) 16:27, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

am i just short on sleep or is the

"preceeded by" "succeeded by"

Backwards? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.165.173.90 (talk) 00:25, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why was my link containing official documents deleted.

How can there be a claim of no sources when there are some people with, apparently some agenda, deleting information.

Nantucketnoon (talk) 01:12, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is that the page was, in large part, an advertisement for the author's book.

WP:EL, the external links guidelines, say that such commercial links are generally to be avoided. I'm not convinced that the information on the rest of the page outweighs the advertising. —C.Fred (talk) 01:13, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

Although I'm not in a position to tidy this up much, I worked a bit on this article today. It really needs some citations, yet I'm far from a Virginia history room and the local library by my dad's house last week said it wouldn't order any books via interlibrary loan unless I changed my residence. :( So here's hoping someone can do the work this bio needs.Jweaver28 (talk) 20:38, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Peyton Randolph. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070926222256/http://www.vahistorical.org/dynasties/index.htm to http://www.vahistorical.org/dynasties/index.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:45, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

. . . either "technically" or otherwise. The United States did not technically exist as a national government until the Articles of Confederation were ratified. The leader under that official regime was the Connecticut native, Samuel Huntington.Mwidunn (talk) 20:06, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Mwidunn: I eliminated this assertion, which I agree is nonsense. Of course, the nation did not yet exist, but also, Randolph was elected only to lead the assembly not the colonies which remained separate sovereignties for seven more years. You are absolutely correct about the Articles of Confederation and Huntington as the first leader of the newly formed Confederated Congress. The only "corrective" there is the Articles intentionally did not allow for a chief executive (they were fed up with kings), so "technically" the U.S. did not have a leader. Allreet (talk) 12:15, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]