Talk:Pittenweem

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

UK geography Low‑importance Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Scotland Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Fisheries and Fishing Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fisheries and Fishing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fisheries, aquaculture and fishing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fisheries and FishingWikipedia:WikiProject Fisheries and FishingTemplate:WikiProject Fisheries and FishingFishing articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

The use of the Seal of the Royal burgh of Pittenweem by Wikipedia IS ILLEGAL. The belongs to the Royal Burgh of Pittenweem Community Council and must not be used by anybody or organisation without prior permission. Neil Murray, Treasurer, Royal Burgh of Pittenweem Community Council. Email [email protected] —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.13.16.40 (talk) 10:01, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As the site is hosted in the USA, fair use policy is going to apply. Wikipedia is not making any money from use of the seal and since no-one in Fife seems to know there even is a seal, guarding it a bit less zealously may be the way forward! Also, this is the page for discussion about the article on Pittenweem. There is another page devoted to the seal 62.6.161.131 (talk) 11:54, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'd be impressed if anyone could find a citation for this on-line. A simple search on google reveals that there is one person with the psudonym "tornerse" on Bebo. All the links from google are either to his profile or to copies of this wikipedia article. 62.6.161.131 (talk) 11:50, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Removed until someone can provide a reliable citation. --Deskford (talk) 14:26, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed several paragraphs from the Religion section as they appeared to be a copyright violation. They were added to this article in 2007 in this edit by an IP editor, but appear word for word dated 2006 on the BBC website here. --Deskford (talk) 22:57, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110609152620/http://www.fifedirect.org.uk/uploadfiles/publications/c64_Population06Leaflet.pdf to http://www.fifedirect.org.uk/uploadfiles/publications/c64_Population06Leaflet.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—