Talk:PocketDish

This article was nominated for deletion on 22 January 2007. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Speedy Deletion contested

I don't understand how the page is "exclusively promoting" the product. All it says is to describe that it exists and what it does. It is not written with an advertising tone. Jaysbro 03:15, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I don't understand how the page would need to be "fundamentally rewritten" to become an encyclopedia article. The article as it stands is a stub. It hardly says anything at all. It would not require a "rewrite" to become an encyclopedia article; it would require being written. And the write would probably include all the information listed here. Jaysbro 03:15, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Can you point out an article that describes a product without being spam for it, and how this page is spam and the others are not? Jaysbro 03:15, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like the speedy was removed, although the article is now up for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PocketDish -- I suggest you direct your comments there, as well. :) Luna Santin 09:13, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I just hate to see what has become of Wikipedia. Too many ads like this one disguised as articles. It's time to stop all the commercials from sneaking in. this is an encyclopedia not the sale section of a newspaper. The more we allow ads to remain the more others will feel they should also be allowed to advertise. Delete it.
Soapy 07:05, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply
]