Talk:Poltavka culture

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Russia: History / Demographics & ethnography Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the history of Russia task force. This article is supported by the demographics and ethnography of Russia task force. Archaeology This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers. This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist. [[Haplogroup R-M269#R1b1a1a2a2|R1b1a1a2a2]] Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

http://eurogenes.blogspot.com/2016/01/the-poltavka-outlier.html --Sagi2007 (talk) 14:49, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Kautilya3: read this. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 05:59, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

We should have a map of the extent of the Poltavka culture. I believe J. P. Mallory printed one in his book Encyclopedia of Indo-European Culture. Krakkos (talk) 13:12, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

We can't use that map as it would be a copyright violation. The only option would be to ask someone who works on maps at Commons to create an interpretation of it. Again, that would have to be approached with caution so that it's is dissimilar enough to not be blatant plagiarism. Iryna Harpy (talk) 23:12, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Beside a thank for informing us about the genetics, it must urgently be observed to add the leading SNP(s), because the tree topologies change too often and we cannot even equal the same expression between papers of different years. And please, in the text, name author and year, the journlal has to appear in the references! Thank you! Hans J. Holm — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:8108:9640:AC3:29D8:5464:C284:28C9 (talk) 07:23, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Regrettably, after controlling Narasimshan, the genetic results turned out to be quite different, what I corrected.HJJHolm (talk) 15:16, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I dared to order the burial para into exterior, human interior, and grave goods. HJHolm — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:8108:9640:AC3:29D8:5464:C284:28C9 (talk) 08:00, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]