Talk:Pongamia oil

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
WikiProject iconIndia Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconEnergy Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Food and drink
Tagging

This article talk page was automatically added with {{

talk) 22:01, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Since this article is about a non-edible oil, and after consulting with the WikiProject Food and drink, I am removing the Food and Drink tag from here. -Killian441 (talk) 20:44, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Article name change

I am proposing changing the name of this article to Pongamia oil. I recently updated the article and as I stated in the opening paragraph there are many different names for the

Pongamia pinnata
tree including honge, karanja, pungai, etc. The common name for the tree in English seems to be Indian Beech tree, but this doesn't seem to be common when referring to the oil made from the seed. In fact I have done a couple of quick searches and it seems that Honge and Karanja oil are very common for English speakers from India. But it does seem that much of the recent research refers to the oil as Pongamia oil when referencing biodiesel.

A couple of quick searches:

Search Term Google Results SpringerLink Results PubMed Results
"pongamia oil" 64,200 26 18
"honge oil" 9,810 4 0
"karanja oil" 260,000 31 6
"pungai oil" 264 0 0

I'm not an expert in this subject, but while looking for references it definitely seems like Pongamia oil, or Karanja oil, is a better title for this article. Killian441 (talk) 23:20, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have an opinion on the name change, but agree that the other 2 major names seem to be perfectly good names. I created redirects from them.Shajure (talk) 00:42, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe after a few months, we can check the usage of the names and see which is being hit more.Shajure (talk) 00:44, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A couple months have passed and I am updating the table I previously put together. I'm removing "pungai oil" as there were very few results, and including "millettia oil" based on the new name of Pongamia.

Search Term Google Results SpringerLink Results PubMed Results Academic OneFile
"pongamia oil" 147,000 27 19 12
"honge oil" 495,000 5 0 4
"karanja oil" 43,000 33 6 17
"millettia oil" 150,000 0 4 0

It seems like "millettia oil" isn't very popular yet, but I will make a redirect page for it just in case. Looking at the traffic statistics from http://stats.grok.se Karanja oil was accessed 113 times in the last 90 days, while Pongamia oil was only accessed 42 times in the last 90 days. I think these accesses are slightly skewed, as Karanja oil is linked to from Karanja while Pongamia oil has no links at all. While I prefer changing the name to Pongamia oil (or even Millettia oil), there still doesn't seem to be a consensus. Killian441 (talk) 17:47, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Doing another round of this:

Search Term Google Results SpringerLink Results PubMed Results Academic OneFile JSTOR
"pongamia oil" 16,800 44 25 19 5
"honge oil" 4,200 7 0 6 0
"karanja oil" 61,200 47 6 24 2
"millettia oil" 7,300 0 8 2 0

I'm going to change the name to Pongamia oil. The google results fluctuate a lot, and although Karanja has more springerlink and onefile results, I think Pongamia is more closely associated with the tree it comes from. If there are objections we can continue this topic. -Killian441 (talk) 22:50, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge Proposal

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
The result of this discussion was to merge the two articles. Killian441 (talk) 23:25, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am proposing that

Millettia pinnata seed oil be merged with Pongamia oil (this article) as they both discuss the same topic. The only point of contention is the name of the proposed article. I recommend Pongamia oil as the name, as I think it has more traction and is more common. -Killian441 (talk) 00:12, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

I agree to merge with pongamia oil as they both discuss the same topic.Palagiri (talk) 01:34, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.