Talk:Portsmouth Block Mills

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Military history: Maritime / British / European / Napoleonic era This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces: /  Maritime warfare task force British military history task force European military history task force Napoleonic era task force (c. 1792 – 1815) Mills Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mills, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mills on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MillsWikipedia:WikiProject MillsTemplate:WikiProject MillsMills articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. United Kingdom Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

As an admiral, John Jervis had a very large impact on the operations of the Portsmouth Block Mills, yet he is not mentioned anywhere in this article. -- Brothernight (talk) 20:23, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Either the London Science Museum or National Maritime Museum had working models of this machinery, I still have the guide book published to accompany the models, I understand it is all in store somewhere, should be resurrected and put on display. 86.2.163.243 (talk) 23:30, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you are sure you are right, edit the article to include the information citing your source. Nevertheless, the dockyards were run by the Navy Board under the supervision of the Admiralty, not directly by the Admiralty (as they were from the 1830s). Jarvis may well have approved of what was proposed, but that does not make him responsible for its creation. Peterkingiron (talk) 19:04, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Andy Dingley: Regarding this passage:

in 1808 130,000 blocks were produced

Normally, I'd put a comma after "in 1808" at the beginning of any sentence or (as in this case) a clause in a compound sentence. It matches the pacing of how the sentence would be read out loud, and reflects the fact that a prepositional phrase that modifies the verb has been moved all the way to before the subject of the sentence. For example, see how commas are used in "In 1979," and "In 2001," in Spotlight (film)#Plot and "In 1900," in Michelin Guide. In this case I think a comma is even more necessary because the next word is actually a number, and I found it particularly confusing to have them jammed up next to each other. -- Beland (talk) 17:11, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I rephrased to move the numbers further apart, which seems like a better improvement. Beland (talk) 14:55, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]