Talk:Pre-Indo-European
 | This disambiguation page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small}
.svg){kind=small}
Untitled
Should a discussion of the
Sami_people have lived in Scandanavia since well before Germanic settlement there. And of course Russia west of the Urals has been populated by various Uralic peoples since well before Slavic settlement... --Blackcats
18:46, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Picts
Should
Picts be included? --Error 01:56, 8 May 2005 (UTC)
]
- I just came to ask the exact same question. — Trilobite (Talk) 19:56, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- imho, this article is inherently broken due to its title. It should redirect to dab (ᛏ)18:01, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- imho, this article is inherently broken due to its title. It should redirect to
- I agree with a redirect, as soon as all pertinent info is worked into Old European Culture. In other words, most of the groups mentioned here need to be mentioned there. Decius02:14, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Article history
- On 9 June 2005 the content of this article was merged into Old European cultureand this article was replaced with a redirect to that article.
- Several editors objected to the redirect. (See Old European culture was merged into Neolithic Europe.
- On 9 March 2006 this article was recreated with content describing Gimbutas’s “Old Europe” hypothesis.
- On 5 November 2007 that article was renamed to Old European cultureand the content prior to the 9 June 2005 merge was restored.
--
teb728 22:15, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
]
Title
I see my move to
Abtract (talk) 17:00, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
]
- it is a disambiguation page, becase "Pre-Indo-European" may refer to any of the topics linked to. See, the articles aren't called "Pre-Indo-European", but a link to dab (𒁳) 18:29, 2 May 2008 (UTC)]
- Going by the way wikipedia defines a disambiguation page this is not one. From Taemyr (talk) 19:22, 6 May 2008 (UTC)]
- Going by the way wikipedia defines a disambiguation page this is not one. From
Disambiguation
This disambiguates three truly different issues:
- pre-Proto-Indo-European(linguistic)
- Indo-European substrate hypotheses (linguistic) -- currently no central article (Substrates in Indo-European languages??) hence the sublist
- the archaeological connection to Kurganization)
all three topics may be casually referred to by "pre-Indo-European", depending on context. I don't see the problem, and hence don't understand why the page is marked for cleanup. --
dab (𒁳) 18:50, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
]
- I suggest you read Abtract (talk) 19:05, 2 May 2008 (UTC)]
- I suggest you avoid patronizing me. Disambiguation pages are solely intended to allow users to choose among several Wikipedia articles, usually when a user searches for an ambiguous term. This is exactly what this page is for. Try to understand a topic before you get all argumentative, or, more embarassingly, condescending. --dab (𒁳) 07:49, 3 May 2008 (UTC)]
- I've put the cleanup tag back on the page. Regardless of whether these various links should all appear on this page or not, the fact is that the page doesn't follow Wikipedia:Manual of Style (disambiguation pages) at all. There's a format that disambig pages should follow, with an introductory line, with one blue link per entry, each on its own line, and so on. --Xyzzyplugh (talk) 08:48, 3 May 2008 (UTC)]
- I've put the cleanup tag back on the page. Regardless of whether these various links should all appear on this page or not, the fact is that the page doesn't follow
- I suggest you avoid patronizing me. Disambiguation pages are solely intended to allow users to choose among several Wikipedia articles, usually when a user searches for an ambiguous term. This is exactly what this page is for. Try to understand a topic before you get all argumentative, or, more embarassingly, condescending. --