Talk:Processing
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The contents of the Processing.js page were merged into Processing. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. (January 2022) |
1 Dec 2020 Donation-ware status chage
From 1 Dec 2020, by forcing payments aka 'donations' for access to source codes & software downloads, it became donation-ware.
Since 1 Dec 2002 it violates the rule of open-source community for free and unrestricted acceess to software and it is sources, it only available to donwload for at least 5$ donation, starting from 1 Dec till 31 Dec 2020.
The preceding unsigned text is not correct. Source is available without donation at https://github.com/processing/processing Licensed under https://github.com/processing/processing/blob/master/license.txt Abav (talk) 15:51, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
Untitled
The "better" Hello World example gives errors if it is cut-pasted into the editor -- the font file specified does not come with the standard distribution (on Windows at least). Hence, I propose removing this example in favor of one that works after just cut-pasting the example code.
The map of the USA example could be improved by a brief explanation of how the software knows the position and shape of the states on the wikipedia map.
—Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.215.220.163 (talk) 23:20, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
No consensus to delete. Remove VfD notice. VfD discussion below.
From Cleanup: Processing - Is this an ad? Certainly nothing that links there is appropriate - Conrad Leviston
- Should be rewritten to focus on processing in general, but perhaps also mentioning the software that the article currently talks about briefly. Cadr
- Keep for now. Looks like a significant work and although it may read as advertising, we also include coca colain here. The article looks factual to me. But I do agree about incorporating into a wider article.
- Though I agree the page reads like an ad, Processing does appear to be a well established program. --Neko18 01:10, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
- strong keep Processing is one of the most important development environments / environments for teaching in the new media arts / visual design fields. It is very significant and has revolutionized pedagogy globally. It has lead to dozens of offshoot projects and has inspired new methods of organizing projects that have been adopted throughout the field of new media art, visual design; Arduino, Wiring, and Openframeworks are among these. For proof of notability, please understand that this project won a Golden Nica at Ars Electronica - ostensibly the highest honor that can be earned in this field. For reference, please see http://www.aec.at/prix/en/winners/2005-prix-gewinner-net-vision/ and for more reference, see here: http://www.gama-gateway.eu/index.php?id=21 (Pcatanese (talk) 09:24, 10 March 2013 (UTC))
It seems to me that this makes far more sense as a separate article than it would under Processing, although it could stand to be expanded. I'll see if I can come up with a whole lot more to say about it. --Oolong 11:54, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
I am the person who has added the references to the Wiring project and to the Golden Nica Prize. I don't think it is an ad at all. Processing certainly is a major language taught at Art and Design schools that want to expose visual creators to the craft of programming. -- Javier Candeira
Fair use rationale for Image:Processing-loading-logo.gif
Please go to
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
File extension
Somewhere PDE should be noted as the usual file extension for processing source files. —Preceding unsigned comment added by T.kalka (talk • contribs) 20:52, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Processing is NOT language
This is big mistake. Processing is just an IDE and library written in (and for) Java and can be used with other languages like Scala. Someone should amend it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.254.155.226 (talk) 22:51, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
- It uses Java and can be used in Java applications, but it has it's own syntax and requires no knowledge of Java. It's purpose is to be a simple language so you don't have to learn Java. It was designed for non-programmers, not Java developers (though as you state, it can be used as an API to extend visual elements). Morphh (talk) 03:16, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
- It doesn't have its own syntax.--24.185.85.196 (talk) 17:02, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Processing is a Java subset or a Java framework but no programming language that stands on its own. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.50.53.0 (talk) 22:06, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Other IDEs derived from Processing should be added
There is another fork from processing is called Energia www.energia.nu — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cjdg (talk • contribs) 17:23, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
Unnecessary quote
I don't think the quote in section
- I agree. I just went ahead and removed it. It was already covered in the history section much less obtrusively. The quote is also sourced from github, which is probably less a than ideal: it's not independent, it's the author of the subject speaking, and it's essentially trivia. talk) 12:11, 25 June 2019 (UTC)]
- I agree. I just went ahead and removed it. It was already covered in the history section much less obtrusively. The quote is also sourced from github, which is probably less a than ideal: it's not independent, it's the author of the subject speaking, and it's essentially trivia.
Merger proposal
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- Merge to Processing (programming language)#Processing.js
- Merge to
Since
- Support makes sense, given the project status and the small size of the processing.js article. If no one replies her in the coming month or so, you could just try redirecting the js article here and integrating the content. --- Possibly ☎ 22:21, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
- Support, non-notable on its own. fgnievinski (talk) 03:40, 29 November 2021 (UTC)]
Processing
Ffui 103.121.172.14 (talk) 14:58, 30 October 2022 (UTC)