Talk:RadicalMedia

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Companies To-do: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes Maintain : Portal:Companies Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs Other : Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner Answer requests for comments

I was going to go through this, but there is way too much work to be done. Here's my feedback on how to get it closer to Wikipedia's standards:

• Reduce long lists. Many of these awards, philanthropic activities, etc. appear notable, but they should be in summary style, paragraph format with only the most significant ones pointed out. The same goes for lists of markets you serve or formats you support.
• Add encyclopedic content Since we are an encyclopedia, we want to know information like business strategy, corporate culture and most important of all History, but the current article is almost exclusively focused on showcasing the company's work.
• Major trimming Almost everything in the current article needs to go. It can all be condensed into 1 section on radical media's services with 1 sub-section on awards and 1 sub-section on notable works. Each should be about 2 paragraphs. The rest should be on History and other aspects.

Cpirrung (talk) 12:14, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That's not a reason to remove the tags - someone needs to deal with the problems first. Whatsmore, as an editor with a clear conflict of interest, you shouldn't be removing the tags yourself. SmartSE (talk) 19:11, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The company's official website uses the name form "RadicalMedia". Why is it then that this article insists on using the form "@radical.media"? It seems this is in conflict with the manual of style on trademarks, so I would propose to move this article to "Radical Media (company)". Jon Harald Søby (talk) 07:34, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110929042530/http://www.canneslions.com/work/pr/entry.cfm?entryid=18731 to http://www.canneslions.com/work/pr/entry.cfm?entryid=18731

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—