Talk:Rainey Bennett
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Copyright issue
Regarding this edit: I think the link in the notice is wrong and should be this one instead: http://articles.chicagotribune.com/1998-12-15/news/9812150313_1_art-institute-mr-bennett-chicago . As the notice says not to change it, what is the appropriate course of action? Or is it a moot point, as long as the text is amended appropriate? isaacl (talk) 23:57, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
- The key part is not which link is being copied - but whether this article does copy exact wording sans proper attribution of such. I do know it caused the plagiarism detector to have a fit <g>. I came here because of philately of all things ... but some of the wording struck me on this and other articles as not natural <sigh>. Collect (talk) 00:45, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
- Just wanted to make a note, since when I visited the referenced link and didn't see any overlap with the deleted lead, I was uncertain where the text was apparently copied from. isaacl (talk) 00:48, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
- Thank you - I believe the cite I gave is a fit for the second section - you might look at that. I really can not believe that this sort of writing is still going on in Wikipedia though. Again - thank you. I think several sources might be involved for sure. Collect (talk) 00:51, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
- Just wanted to make a note, since when I visited the referenced link and didn't see any overlap with the deleted lead, I was uncertain where the text was apparently copied from. isaacl (talk) 00:48, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
Copyright problem removed
Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://web.archive.org/web/20141010001237/http://www.chicagomodern.org/artists/rainey_bennett/ and http://articles.chicagotribune.com/1998-12-15/news/9812150313_1_art-institute-mr-bennett-chicago. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see
For
- Additional copyright issues were scattered throughout the article beyond the flagged section and have been removed or, in one case, rewritten. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 21:30, 21 November 2015 (UTC)