Talk:Ramankutty Nair

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Arts and Entertainment This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group. This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter. India: Kerala Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Kerala (assessed as Mid-importance). This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.

For a one-line stub followed by four source links needs citations? Doesn't seem to be tagged for right reasons. I am removing the tag, as it's looking like the singular most inappropriate tag on WP. Aditya^{(talk • contribs)} 05:36, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Once again User:NAHID uses the edit summary instead of the talk page, even when there was an explicit request. This person has found out quite a few loopholes in the policies, and making good use of them to troll me. Its kind of irritating. I hope he starts concentrating more on the articles he explicitly declared to be developing. Sigh. Aditya^{(talk • contribs)} 05:23, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• I don't see your explicit request here (no need for that). "Legendary performer" - this peacock word, either remove it or provide a reference. That you have already provided by altering them ("Legendary performer" to "Prominent performer" [1]). Added citation tag isn't trolling. And also, beware about your edit summary that you labelled as trolling. Don't do that.--NAHID 20:19, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The article now has quite a bit of good stuff on it. Only it needs a thorough rewrite and ample citations. Any takers? Aditya^{(talk • contribs)} 14:56, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like everyone has put some work into rewrites, but what about section headings.GarbledLecture933 (talk) 02:40, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• fixed — Preceding unsigned comment added by GarbledLecture933 (talk • contribs) 02:43, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]