Talk:Razakars (Pakistan)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
WikiProject iconMilitary history: Asian / South Asia
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
B checklist
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
  1. Referencing and citation: criterion not met
  2. Coverage and accuracy: criterion met
  3. Structure: criterion met
  4. Grammar and style: criterion met
  5. Supporting materials: criterion met
Associated task forces:
/ 
Taskforce icon
Asian military history task force
Taskforce icon
South Asian military history task force
WikiProject iconBangladesh Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Bangladesh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bangladesh on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BangladeshWikipedia:WikiProject BangladeshTemplate:WikiProject BangladeshBangladesh articles
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Note icon
The article falls into the work area of the History workgroup of WikiProject Bangladesh
WikiProject Bangladesh To-do list:
WikiProject iconPakistan Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan articles
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

although the article seems sound, it does reveal the authors bias to a certain extent in the gratuitous use of adjectives for the violence and crimes perpetrated by the razakars, rather than providing facts and links to them and letting the reader decide..

there are also some grammatical errors.

Can someone please improve upon the article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Skandaprasadn (talk • contribs) 05:33, 13 October 2006

Change of title

The article requires disambiguation: There are 4 categories of razakars:

I propose that the article should be titled Razakars (East Pakistan) as there are already Razakars in Pakistan. Besides its positive generic in Urdu, but a political slang in Bengali language.Messiaindarain (talk) 15:25, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

New content

Added a new content as Trial to describe the prosecutions of the razakars. --Kmzayeem (talk) 15:31, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Page title

Please stop moving the page, do a request move correctly. Darkness Shines (talk) 07:13, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What correctly? There was no conflict between me and you regarding the name of the Article, you said that "do a requested move", you did not talk about any controversy.
talk) 11:39, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

Page title requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: no consensus. Jenks24 (talk) 10:52, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


talk) 11:58, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

Here are a few Google Books and News References, which support Razakar Backround to be East Pakistan: Books(1), Books(2), Daily Star.
talk) 12:03, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply
]
Agree with you In ictu oculi! Its should be moved for better precision.
talk) 17:35, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply
]
What is this ""rommrow""? From where you see this as drunk stuff? Do you have drunk stuff in support of your response?
talk) 05:17, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply
]
Agree with your opinion Mar4d! They were not present in the whole of Pakistan, but only in the province of
talk) 11:00, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply
]
Mar4d was canvassed[1], he has never edited[2][3] this page before. Darkness Shines (talk) 14:46, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Razakar ordinance says to it's recrutement policy- "Any citizen of Pakistan who satisfies the prescribed conditions may be recruited as a Razakar in prescribed manner" . So it was not only an East Pakistan based militia group.--FreemesM (talk) 18:34, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Please excuse the previous drunken typos, my keyboard died, My oppose is based on the fact that this was a Pakstani miltia at he time that Bangladesh was a part of Pakistan. Darkness Shines (talk) 21:03, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Yes! Anyone could join Razakars, even Indians, West Pakistanis, East Pakistanis, or foreigners. But they were only East Pakistanis which actually were constituting Razakars. There was no link between the two provinces of Pakistan through which West Pakistanis could be sent for helping Razakars!
talk) 11:13, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply
]
So anyone could join but they were still eastern? At the time they were Pakistani citizens, hence the current title is just fine. Darkness Shines (talk) 14:39, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Its not as fine as you think! They were Eastern only... They were Biharis. They references i have given up also support it. Razakars should be named after those brave East Pakistanis.
talk) 14:58, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply
]
I think Razakar ordinance is the most valuable reference than others. Read it carefully again "Any citizen of Pakistan who satisfies the prescribed conditions may be recruited as a Razakar in prescribed manner" . Do you understand it now?--FreemesM (talk) 16:18, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oh yes! Thats a good point! But that is only for "Condition of Recruitment". Please have a look here. Even the name of the ordinance is "THE EAST PAKISTAN RAZAKARS ORDINANCE"! The Title proves my point of Razakars background to be East Pakistan
talk) 09:42, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply
]
Dear Faizan, this point is very simple. This ordinance says, Razakars could be recruited from anywhere in Pakistan, but should be employed in East Pakistan. So both east and west Pakistan was involved here. So the current title seems ok.--FreemesM (talk) 12:42, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Brother Freemesm! The point we are discussing is of employment! Many people could be recruited in Razakars, but it is a clear point that Razakars operated in East Pakistan, isn't it?
talk) 12:53, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply
]
There is also an Article here about
talk) 13:08, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply
]
Don't bring reference of another Wikipedia article. It is not static and eternal. If you think Razakars (Hyderabad) should be renamed to Razakars (India), then go there and urge for it. The fact is the whole war between BD-Pak was carried out by Pakistan (West). All the orders were carried out from Pakistan (West), which is now known as Pakistan. So it is reasonable to name it Razakars (Pakistan).--FreemesM (talk) 15:03, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
It was carried out by the Biharis only, Bengalis were a part of Mukti Bahini, put the geographical entity in which both of them operated was of
talk) 15:56, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply
]
Did you read East Pakistan Razakar ordinance? The geographical area determines the name of the Article.
talk) —Preceding undated comment added 15:58, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply
]
It was carried out by the Biharis only. totally false info, Biharis were driven by west pak army. Listen, at the time of war the government was occupied by west Pak army and their chosen persons. There was no East Pakistan government. All the orders were issued from Karachi. See page no 159, it was signed by Tikka Khan. Do you know where was he from? google it.--FreemesM (talk) 20:45, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Alright even if they were Biharis, or were sent from West Pakistan, where did they operate? They just operated in East Pakistan, and that's the point!
talk) 10:52, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply
]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review
. No further edits should be made to this section.

"Famous Razakars"

The Razakars were a

security force, not a political ideology, please do not include all people opposed to the independence of Bangladesh. 119.148.3.14 (talk) 06:17, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

Relevancy of Abdur Rahim's training

I have moved from the article to here the phrase "who was trained at the

USAID
". It is sourced, and would be worth including in a biography of Abdur Rahim, but its relevance to this topic is unclear.

The International Police Academy (IPA) and broader Office of Public Safety trained over a million police officers worldwide. Journalist Lifschultz says Rahim was one of 113 middle and senior level Pakistani police executives who received "training in modern police administration and operations"[1] at the IPA. That training could be relevant if it got Rahim the job or was an example of the IPA intentionally or unintentionally making "repressive regimes even more repressive" (one reason the program was shut down a few years later). Lifshultz says repression was problematic in Vietnam, Uruguay, and Central America, but doesn't say whether the training made Rahim, the Razakars, or Pakistan any more repressive during the Bangladesh Liberation War than they would have been without it.[1]

Including the phrase here without broader context is innuendo that implies a degree of connection between the Razakars and the US that the source doesn't support. Samar Sen's review of Bangladesh: The Unfinished Revolution describes the material as vague and says, "Lifschultz's attempts at unraveling the truth have not been wholly fruitful".[2] I agree, but have no objection to information about Rahim's training being re-introduced if a second source can be found to show relevance, and if the information is presented in context.

References

  1. ^
    ISBN 0-905762-07-X
    .
  2. JSTOR 23001796
    .

--Worldbruce (talk) 18:50, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Razakars_(Pakistan)&oldid=1209980587"