Talk:Rebel Heart Tour (album)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Good topic candidate
Promoted
Current status: Good article

Requested move 6 July 2017

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Not moved  — Amakuru (talk) 12:21, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Rebel Heart Tour (album)Madonna: Rebel Heart Tour – Official name of the album as per artist's press release here —IB [ Poke ] 16:18, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is a contested technical request (permalink).  — Amakuru (talk) 21:12, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@
John Cline:, I have reverted your reversion. The previous one was created by an user and had failed notability then completely and had been redirected for a long time. Just FYI, all the concert films for the artist Madonna never has any independent notability beyond the tour. They are always a part of the concert film video release and live album. Her live albums get the notability. WE need to first establish the name for the album. —IB [ Poke ] 04:17, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply
]
I have added both as hatnotes on the main Rebel Heart Tour article. In ictu oculi (talk) 07:09, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
No it does not need film as dab as none of the tour films have any separate article because of failing WP:N, same for this one. Madonna: Rebel Heart Tour has all the content from it merged in this article. We are not here to discuss the independent notability of both articles, we are here to discuss the correct naming of the DVD release. —IB [ Poke ] 04:17, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. Proposed name is confusing, and unrecognisable to all but Madonna fans. If the guidelines justify such a move then the guidelines are wrong... but there doesn't seem much of a case anyway, it's just the common but invalid appeal to the
    WP:AT, I really don't know. We already notify those who raise RMs that the nomination should be in terms of this policy, and in several different places. Can anyone think of another we might try? Andrewa (talk) 02:01, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply
    ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Critical reviews

1 2 3 4 5 6 not really a review but talks about DVD

--Chrishm21 (talk) 21:27, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]