Talk:Renewable energy in Finland

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Energy Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Finland Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Finland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FinlandWikipedia:WikiProject FinlandTemplate:WikiProject FinlandFinland articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Environment: Sustainability Start‑class Mid‑importance Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Sustainability task force.

The quality of the writing is poor, and there are several inaccuracies and unclear statements. For example, the energy consumption per capita is given as 17 MW. Is this 17 MWh per year? Must be. 17 MW per capita on average does not make any sense. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.143.165.49 (talk) 04:51, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"The solar environment is almost similar to Austria. Thus, based on the solar radiation in Finland, Finland could use the solar energy much more intensively."

No sources I found agreed with this statement. http://www.solar4power.com/images/map-europe-E-NA-solar-power.jpg This doesn't. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hvatum (talk • contribs) 06:55, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

/// This article is a mess of propaganda and opinions, whoever thought it would be a good idea to discuss local politics like the subway system or public transportation should rethink their agenda a bit. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.50.71.0 (talk) 18:21, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Article shows political bias. Facts (Eurostat, http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/tgm/table.do?tab=table&init=1&plugin=1&language=en&pcode=t2020_31) indicate Finland in top renewable EU countries in 2010. I was looking for current figures, but the way this article is written now doesn't quite help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 167.202.201.5 (talk) 13:10, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I removed at least some of the ranting. --

Greenpeace Neste Spoil page is short of parody. I expect Bilmar refers to Wilmar International, a Singapore based palm oil company. Watti Renew (talk) 16:00, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]