Talk:Return of the Ewok

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Film: American Star Wars Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Star Wars, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Star Wars saga on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Star WarsWikipedia:WikiProject Star WarsTemplate:WikiProject Star WarsStar Wars articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Star Wars To-do: edit history watch purge Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Assess : Tag the talk pages of Star Wars-related articles with the {{WikiProject Star Wars}} banner. Update the classification of articles in Category:Unassessed Star Wars articles and Category:Unknown-importance Star Wars articles. Citing sources : Jedi, Sith Cleanup : Remove any In-universe information at Category:Star Wars articles that need to differentiate between fact and fiction. Copyedit : Under Early Life. Fix grammar of "towns (plural) predominantly Protestant technical college" to "town's (possessive)..." Stubs : Category:Star Wars stubs Other : * See the things to do page Notability: Articles with notability concerns, listed at WikiProject Notability Comedy This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

There is way too much pasive voice in this article. An interested editor should rewrite the phrase in the Bootlegs section "a recording of the entire film was put on eBay by someone who attended a screening," adding more and cite a reference. As is, how can a reader verify this statement?TheRingess 19:56, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I wrote this article originally and am not that great of a writer. I'm more of an editor. Thanks for re-worded some of the sections. I'll try to find the source for that claim. The Wookieepedian 20:12, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]