Talk:Rhesus (play)

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Theatre Low‑importance This article is part of WikiProject Theatre, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of theatre on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.TheatreWikipedia:WikiProject TheatreTemplate:WikiProject TheatreTheatre articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Classical Greece and Rome Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Greece Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greece on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. inactive .DaciaWikipedia:WikiProject DaciaTemplate:WikiProject DaciaDacia articles

The Paris under characters links to Paris the city - any way to fix this besides unlinking? Is there an article for the character? Chooserr 04:37, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for pointing that out, it's fixed. (Also I noticed I accidently forgot to put the "E" in "BCE" - hahaha) -Ravenous 04:44, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And I thought you were rehabilitated :-( - Oh well, we'll just keep working at it :-) Chooserr 04:46, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

We've got two conflicting accounts on who started the controversy. 132.204.191.72 added something to the beginning claiming it was Joseph Scaliger. At the end of the article under the Controversy section, we've got L. C. Valckenaer. Although the new anonymous edit is unsourced, it "sounds" like they know what they're talking about. We should get a source for it and move it to the Controversy section though. - Ravenous 04:05, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It would be better to find journal article citations, or to cite Liapis' new commentary (<http://bmcr.brynmawr.edu/2013/2013-03-15.html>, not available to me at the moment), rather than citing the introduction to Walton's translation. Walton's translations and textbooks aren't the authoritative places to find this discussion.

• Start class - Needs formatting changes to conform to Wikipedia:WikiProject_Theatre/Article_Structure guidelines. Analysis heading should be created, as there's probably academic literature available to flesh it out.
• Low importance - a single play constitutes a "highly specific area of knowledge"

--Dereksmootz (talk) 00:31, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]