Talk:Richard Graham (politician)
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Conflict of interest editing and edit war??
I note the repeated removal of properly cited material by one or more
If you look at any related pages for backbench British politicians there is no where near as much detail as this one. We have noted that many of those who originally added the details had a conflict of interest and so simply wished to remove the excessive detail. In the interest of neutrality we have left several details which could be perceived as negative but removed unnecessary additions. Megggg6543 (talk) 10:11, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
- Your comments have been noted. However I still believe you have a conflict of interest. You are free to report others with a conflict of interest but ]
- Biased editing yet again! I'm here to create an encyclopaedia not write an election flyer -see wp:NOTHERE!
- 82.32.72.87, Megggg6543 has agreed to work with me to see if we can produce a better more neutral article and everything she has done recently appears compliant. I routinely work with experienced editors of different beliefs without any problem and I write about politicians of both major parties, particularly looking at removing bias. Please do not undo my recent edits without a good reason. If you still believe I am biased please say why -on this talk page -and I will ask a third party to look at it.
- You both have useful expertise on this constituency. You might like to look at Wikipedia:Good article criteria as a standard we should try and meet. Regards JRPG (talk) 19:32, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
- Biased editing yet again! I'm here to create an encyclopaedia not write an election flyer -see
Eton
@
Only Cantonese & Mandarin speaker.
@2a02:c7d:c83d:ce00:545b:ad2d:5080:b457: Greetings 2a02:c7d:c83d:ce00:545b:ad2d:5080:b457. Your edit of 21:51, 17 May 2017 relating to "Graham being the only Parliamentarian who speaks Cantonese and Mandarin" inserted text describing his claim as "patently false." That appears unnecessarily offensive to the subject, hence I removed it. Whilst the claim is minor, as you say, Ashdown passed an interpreter's course and it therefore appears to wrong so I'll remove it. Regards JRPG (talk) 20:38, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
At some point there will be a Wiki page on MPs owned by the CCP
And this traitor will be at the top of the list, I though it worth noting now. 82.9.95.224 (talk) 08:09, 6 August 2020 (UTC)